Impeach bush?

Question

I know the votes don't exist to see impeachment through, but is Cindy Sheehan right that Democrats should go ahead with impeachment anyway?

Answer 1

Yeah she is. We should have impeached him long ago. He got in way over his head and didn't try to fix it so he would look like he was contradicting his decision. Instead he tried to cover it up which only made matters worse. He doesn't have the intelligence or wisdom to be president . To tell you the truth the only reason i think he became president was because his brother was governor of Florida and his father was a famous president so people thought he was going to make a good president. WRONG. But that's my opinion sorry if it offends anyone

Answer 2

Yeah sure, go ahead with it. I need the laugh.

Dems: We move to impeach Bush.
Reps: On what grounds?
Dems: Uh......Cindy Sheehan won't shut up til we do.
Reps: Do you have proof of any crimes he has committed.
Dems: Uh........well........no. Not in the legal sense. But it does depend on what your definition of "has" is.
Reps: Thank you for handing back control of the House and Senate. Have a good day.

Answer 3

The Democrats can't magically get him out of office. At this point in time, all that sort of talk is just campaigning for a Democratic president next term. Bush has very little time left in office anyway; the purpose of the "impeach-Bush" nonsense is to arouse public sentiment in favor of the Democrats/opposition to the Republicans as election time draws nearer.

Answer 4

On what grounds? People are just coming up with this crap for the people who don't pay that much attention to what's happening. If they hear this radical nonsense, then those people will probably say, "Wow, republicans must not be very good" and they'll probably vote Democrat. I haven't really heard about why they want to impeach him except the fact that whatever-her-name-is lost her son in the war. This stuff happens every time there's a war.

Answer 5

No. Sheehan is wrong.

The House voting for Impeachment, when the Senate will never convict (regardless of evidence) is a waste of time and effort.

The House action would have no more effect than a non-binding resolution, and arguable a failed Impeachment is more likely to backfire on them then just a censure vote.

Answer 6

Yes in liberal world Cindy Sheehan ids the voice of reason.

Answer 7

I don't know where all of this hatred of the President is coming from. Do any of you people have any clue what the President has done in office? Do any of you know about the humanitarian aid he's given to Africa? He's given more aid than any two past Presidents combined. As for Iraq, he did what he thought was right. Can you fault him for it? Can you fault him for trying to end a tyrannical ruler who killed his own people? Can you fault him for wanting justice for 9/11? Do any of you remember 9/11? I stood only blocks away as those towers fell. Forgive me for not forgetting the people who died in that terrorist attack. So I'm going to state the unpopular answer, and say we shouldn't impeach the President. Go ahead and rate this answer badly if it makes you feel better.

Answer 8

No because the Dems don't want to look like idiots during an election year. They don't have the votes or an impeachable offence to charge him with. It would be a waste of time and effort. And could be used by the Republicans against them.

Answer 9

Sheehan is just mad at the world because her son was killed in Iraq. It is sad that she is trying to do everything in her power to make her voice heard, but she is looking bad in the process. I guess she thinks her son died in vain. So the answer to your question no. You can't get impeached to be ignorant.

Answer 10

I'm sorry is there an impeachable offense the rest of us don't know about