the respond wherein you're informed to get a greater modern card misses the component of your question. I even have and use very luckily the two an X1600 AGP and an X1650 PCI-E. They greater advantageous than blow away the NV. The FX5200 became a chew of crap whilst it got here out, possibly in ordinary terms overwhelmed because of the fact the worst card of its day by making use of the S3 VirGE. people who returned submit to in techniques the Decelerater, I ask for forgiveness to. because of the fact something of your gadget is amazingly dated, (S478, 865PE chipset, DDR), you is probably not waiting to pastime at as severe a point as you may choose. The video card you're asking approximately has diverse limits, (DX9, MSAA isn't lots good right here, low ROPs, limited inner bandwidth), yet once you drop the determination and decrease the attention candy, you will desire to be waiting to play on line relatively satisfactorily. i take advantage of the two one among mine on Steam and have not any genuine issues. My video games on Steam comprise Audiosurf, HalfLife 2, HL2 DM, lost Coast, Quake a million, 2, 3, Trackmania, Unreal adventure 3. i'm hoping this enables. good success.
2016-12-14 17:14:11
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
the 5200 is at least DirectX 9 compatable, the 9250 is only DirectX 8 compatable.
the nVidia is the better of the two very low end cards.
2007-07-23 17:33:34
·
answer #3
·
answered by tigerkitty2 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Fan boy's aside, in this case, assuming they both have the same amount of RAM on the card, and you are using it for gaming (not number crunching for say CAD programs) the nVidia would take the prize.
2007-07-23 17:36:32
·
answer #4
·
answered by The Anonymous 1
·
1⤊
0⤋