by republicans? I seen a ford explorer today and on the back window it said "Who would Al qaida vote for?" Is this supposed to link a political party with terrorism? That is so closed minded and stupid, I don't even know were to start.
2007-07-23 15:36:26 · 17 answers · asked by Coma White 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
#1con - how is this true? I don't think anyone is for terrorism. Just because liberals are against a pointless war that has nothing to do with bin laden, that makes them a terrorist? I am interested in why you think this war is even necessary.
2007-07-23 15:42:14 · update #1
and I don't think terrorists would want anyone from either party in office, they would not like our democratic system, they would rather run the country than a certain party. And for those of you who say the liberals are soft for wanting to leave, my question to you is what is the point in staying? The area has actually gotten worse since we have been there. Please address this question, I am interested in the reasons for wanting to stay there.
2007-07-23 15:46:30 · update #2
jack bauer my hero - it is really sad that you would want to give up your rights in the patriot act. And have you ever thought it is a possibility that bush was really lax on terrorists to begin with and thats why 9/11 happened? You can't blame Clinton because it was almost 2 yrs after he left.
2007-07-23 15:53:20 · update #3
hillary tuff on terror - I am interested in how it was the left's fault for Bush's misinformation on the Iraq WMDs.
2007-07-23 15:55:51 · update #4
Bruce L - the problem with that logic is, how do you know they are terrorists? They do often times get innocent people. And I also think we should take care of our OWN people here at home first, instead of worrying about another country when we have so many problems that need fixed here at home. I am sure you will agree with me on this point.
2007-07-23 15:59:20 · update #5
Yes, it's a cheap shot.
Just like all the statements that liberals must be on the same side as the terrorists, because they think the constitution should always apply -- as opposed to being willing to ignore the constitution just because the person is accused of doing something really bad.
It's a pure irrational attack, for no reason other than to spread hatred and avoid having to discuss any substantive issues.
2007-07-23 15:46:50 · answer #1 · answered by coragryph 7 · 4⤊ 4⤋
It's a fair question. For both parties. Who do you think is softer on terrorists? Republicans, Democrats? And look beyond that, if you're voting for, let's say the President and it's between candidates A and B, look at their stances on terrorism, who do you think the terrorists would want in office because they're weak on fighting them? Candidate A or B?
edit: 2 years after Clinton left? It was 9 months dude! The elections were in 2000 and Bush took office in '01. Come on, you should know that much!
2007-07-23 22:42:29 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
no, it doesn't link them to a political party, it just typifies the party that is soft, the party that wants to give terrorist equal rights, the party that wants to leave a large number of vulnerable Al-Qaida members in Iraq unopposed, the party who would raise taxes and cut defense to free up money for their socialist agendas. point after point could be made but I think you should get the point
Al-Qaida are self admitted terrorists, why else would they go to Iraq? I have no problem taking care of OUR own people but if you let your enemy get out of hand, they will hurt you, as in 9 months and not almost 2 years after Clinton left office. not a cheap shot just an unfortunate truth.
2007-07-23 22:53:55 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
The main "strength" of the Republican party is defense. I wouldn't lose much sleep over the bumper sticker as 75% of the people oppose the Iraq war. It is definitely a sticker for Republicans reminding the voters that they don't take any crap from people who attack them. You'll see a lot worse cheap shots than that during an election.
2007-07-23 22:47:51 · answer #4 · answered by thedude 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
cheap shot in a world where free speech is a virtue of the slanderous dissenters that call themselves democrats..
yet back Hugo Chavez's right to repress free speech and a free press..that desire the Fairness Doctrine..want Bush impeached for lies that the left crafted and advanced themselves..
I want to know if the little guy was whizzing on Nancy pelosi's
picture on the truck too?
2007-07-23 22:47:40 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Tasteless probably.
However, I'm sure they would much rather see a Democrat in office. Why? Because democrats are stupid enough to believe that you can actually talk to these people and get them to stop. IMHO
2007-07-23 22:55:27 · answer #6 · answered by bigdaddy33 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Just look at the person and ask him who allowed bin laden to get away in Tora Bora? Then tell him Al-Qaeda would vote obviously for republicans. They love these guys...
2007-07-23 22:40:52 · answer #7 · answered by linus_van_pelt_4968 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
if you wanted us to answer the question: i'd say democrats...they do seem softer on terrorists. You may not like Bush but he has kept us safe since 9/11...you have to think what they do behind the scenes to get information from suspected terrorist....but im for torture and the patriot act
2007-07-23 22:45:13 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 4⤋
So do you think they would vote for Rudy Guiliani...or John Edwards?
2007-07-23 22:41:16 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
There is nothing close minded about it at all. Al Qaeda and the liberals want the same thing: for our troops to leave Iraq.
2007-07-23 22:43:20 · answer #10 · answered by SavvyAsh 5 · 3⤊ 4⤋