Anyone still believe a Manned space craft has landed on the moon?

Question

Personally i doubt..Simply no protection against amount of radiation on Moon according to science..When the Yanks were asked to go into some radioactive site said did not have suits strong enogh to with stand radiation,thats what stopped the Russians..Whole pile of DOdgy photos but main thing i cant get is they have not got propulsion for man space craft to leave the moon..Also know they say expensive but why not go back ,other space missions done...Could some more americans be sent to moon please..Did hear Japenese were inventing a telescope that was that powerfull the flag on moon should be visable...Still they can lie to us all..

Answer 1

Protection against radiation???? Did you see the huge suits they had to wear? Those suits weigh 80 Kg - about the weight of the guy.

And what do you mean about no propulsion to get off the moon? That is absolute garbage.

How much longer have intelligent people got to listen to drongos like you, who are totally ignorant about space and history, and think with that zero knowledge you can discount what thousands of intelligent and courageous people did over the course of 11 years.

Answer 2

I'm sure you also doubt that the Earth is spherical, that the Earth is not the centre of the universe, that Oswald alone shot Kennedy and that a bunch of Arab terrorists flew the planes into the World Trade Towers and destroyed them. To people like you everything must be the opposite of the real truth.

The Americans landed on the Moon, period. If you did any research you would know that a thin layer of material is better protection from solar radiation than a thick layer, due to secondary radiation produced by scattering, as the primary radiation can zip through thin material and bodies relatively harmlessly. The propulsion needed to leave the surface of the Moon is much less, because the Moon has less gravity, which someone less studiously ignorant would know.

The suits used were to keep air inside and insulate to keep a livable temperature inside while allowing movement, not an easy thing and at the time it was beyond Russian technology. A lot of things were beyond Russian technical abilities, so they built crude and huge. When pressed by Reagan to really keep up in the arms race, their economy collapsed and their government fell apart, abandoning Communism. They are still second tier technologically when compared to the Western countries.

I am one who thinks a permanent colony on the Moon would be a good idea. There must be minerals to be mined, solar power would refine them. There could be farms under the surface to provide food. All the things sci-fi novels have predicted. But then, you would be one who could be shown photos of a Moon colony and would say it was all faked up in some mine tunnels.

Answer 3

a million) US flag fluttering in Outer area. no person nonetheless believes that! 2) No blast crater on the landing spot of the lunar module. Regolith is fairly heavy dirt. 3) The '+' examine in the digital camera have been at the back of some gadgets in lots of imagery suggesting doctoring. Nah, its merely the way that works. 4) Shadows in diverse instructions yet merely source of sunshine became solar. The solar became by no skill the only source of sunshine. each and every thing lit up is a source of sunshine,too. 5) Astronaut's front area seen even after their lower back became became to the solar. See final answer. 6) Grainy video clips while in comparison with 1969 technologies. It became on the Moon, bear in techniques? 7) Moon's gravity became a million/6th yet astronauts & that motor vehicle became shifting at a million/2th velocity. It became run by utilising 4 batteries. no longer a hotrod. 8) Moon landing impossible as a results of radiation belt. We have been given the Earth to loosen the Radiation Belt some notches for Apollo. do you comprehend what a radiation belt is? 38 minutes in the past 9) Upon superposition of extremely some pictures which have been supposedly taken at diverse places, it became found that the comparable background became used. numerous the Moon seems alike. 10) The cameras fixed on the gap fits could no longer have been used to take such precise photographs as pass became very very complicated with the gap fits. So, how could you have set it up, in case you have been in fee of imagery?

Answer 4

I'm tired of answering these types of questions. Your made up facts about there being too much radiation in the Van Allen Belts or on the moon have been rebutted many times over on many different programs.

If NASA faked the moon landings, then why didn't the USSR expose the U.S. in order to embarrass us?

And where did those big Saturn-V rockets go to that everyone saw taking off? They had to go somewhere.

It has been calculated that it would have been less expensive for NASA to build a rocket and to go to the moon for real than it would for NASA to create and maintain such an elaborate hoax.

And who put those laser reflecting mirrors on the moon that astronomers are using even now to measure how fast the moon is moving away from the Earth? Those mirrors were put there by someone.

You simply believe what you want to.

Answer 5

I'm guessing you weren't around in the 1960's, so you have no idea what was going on then. The dedication, the committment, the political pressure to deliver on a manned moon landing before the end of the 1960's. And even if the technology isn't up to 21st century standards, it was hardly rubber bands and paper clips.

I saw the landing, millions of other saw the landing, thousands of technicians and scientists were involved in the space program for years before the first manned landing.

Every one of your arguments has been voiced by others (there are a lot of conspiracy theorists out there with no scientific knowledge). And every one has been proven by to be a null argument (meaning it doesn't hold its own under scrutiny).
And you keep saying that "they say", but you haven't done the research yourself, you're just parroting others. So you don't know whether what you're quoting is even correct.

Answer 6

YES. However the stuff about radiation is true, they got lucky if it had been two years later then a solar proton event would have probably killed them. You can see the landing site with a good telescope. Leaving the moon takes much less energy than getting their as it is so much smaller than Earth

Answer 7

With some study and some work you could actually verify that astronauts landed on the moon yourself. They left reflective mirrors there that are targeted by lasers on the earth to to determine the distance between the earth and the moon as it changes over time. With some actual research and some real thought put into it you could easily verify this for yourself.
On the other had, you might be like most of the intellectually lazy and gullible people who believe the moon landing was a hoax

Answer 8

Hi. There will always be a "Borderline" fringe that would believe the flag (yes, an American flag) was planted just before they went to the Moon to check out your disbelief. It WAS after all an unbelievable accomplishment!

Answer 9

What possible benefit would it be tothe US government to fabricate the Moon voyages. I mean, the US Government couldn't even figure out how to fabricate WMD's in Iraq, and that would have been ALOT less complicated. Landing on the Moon was hardly a daunting scientific feat. Anyonw how truly beleives it was a big cover-up has a screw loose.

Answer 10

We really did land 12 people on the Moon between 1969 and 1972.