I have been listening to the YouTube democratic debates tonight, and I have noticed that every single candidate seems to be more in touch with the American people and reality than President Bush is. With what we have now, I think any of these candidates would be a vast improvement. I look forward to see if it will be the same with the Republican candidates.
2007-07-23 14:04:45 · 14 answers · asked by madcat 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
OK, now which of you answering voted in the previous presidential elections?
2007-07-23 14:43:51 · update #1
So, what else is new?
2007-07-23 14:17:19 · answer #1 · answered by mstrywmn 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No leader, manager, supervisor or decision maker is any better than the information he has available to him/her to make their decisions. Good information leads to good decisions; bad information leads to bad decisions. In Bush's case, he has some extraordinary skills and abilities; he just has not been able to us them. Hs decisions have been made by Cheney and Rummy. He has shown a lack of ability to digest information and make adequate decisions. He lacks the normal ability to change course when it is obvious he is off track. We can only blame him for part of the problem; we are the idiots who put him in office a second time. We had other elected officials who just stood by while he ran ramped. I am amazed at the candidates who want to be elected on their accomplishments in office over the past seven years; these are the people who should have been forcing Bush to do the write thing. And for the record, not all democrats voted for the war; Obama read the intelligence report and voted against the war. Clinton openly admits she did not read it but had her staff brief her on it and voted for war; isn't that the same basic thing Bush says happened to him; his intelligence people got it wrong? Nixon would be happy to know that someone else is replacing him as the worst president in history!
2007-07-27 20:16:48 · answer #2 · answered by privateeye4U 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
An actual bush from my backyard would be a better President than the Bush in the White House.
2007-07-23 21:07:59 · answer #3 · answered by Mitchell . 5 · 7⤊ 0⤋
If that is the case, then why did every Democratic candidate support the illegal invasion of Iraq, and the passing of unConstitutional Bills like the Patriot Act and Domestic Spying. You must have a really short memory span.
2007-07-23 21:08:19 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
They all looked like deers in headlights. When asked they stuttered, stopped, their eyes got wide and watered.. They were very nervous and unprepared to speak with real Americans. This worries me.
BTW the snowman bit was very very very lame and kind of gayed up the whole thing.
2007-07-23 21:09:05 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Bush is a moron
Democrats > Republicans
Plus most republicans are homo pedophiles (ex: John Curtin, Mark Foley, Jim Kolbe, Ted haggard, etc......)
2007-07-23 21:24:27 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
I'll answer your question with another question. Who wouldn't be a better President than Bush?
2007-07-23 21:12:36 · answer #7 · answered by ajfrederick9867 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋
That's a pretty low bar though. My dog would make a better president than Bush, and he's been dead for three years.
2007-07-23 21:08:36 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 0⤋
you're all way too ignorant, if your neighbor or someone else could be a better president then why arent they... it doesn't matter who is president all they do is what they're told to and take the blame for it
2007-07-23 21:25:11 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Strange., But about 7:20 I was getting ready to puke.
2007-07-23 21:08:49 · answer #10 · answered by Barry auh2o 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
You must be hearing something the rest of us aren't. Maybe you are like a dog and can hear things that regular humans can't.
2007-07-23 21:07:52 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 4⤋