and no WMD
2007-07-23
13:58:20
·
9 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics
Ahchee,,your links ,they are link the WMD,S,,,,nothing,,,ahhh...ok lets move on,,,
2007-07-23
14:14:54 ·
update #1
can someone post me a good link to the 100% proof,im not much on links,,but in this case SINSE WE ARE KILLING PEOPLE i want to see proof of the dreaded ,mass WMD
2007-07-23
14:18:23 ·
update #2
larry ahh the jeffy boy deal is that like "IN LIKE FLINT" or something
2007-07-23
14:19:52 ·
update #3
susi,please add some proof to the details,ok ,I know you can do it,,I I Ill wait..I dont have much of a long term memory.
2007-07-23
14:22:34 ·
update #4
steph,,,,noI I don,t know the real reason ,I can not recall clearly haaaaaa,tell me again ok...
2007-07-23
14:25:07 ·
update #5
There was plenty of time for Iraq to rid themselves of WMD's following Clinton's suspicions re: them. If you recall, Hussein did NOT conform to the UN sanctions within the allotted time, ergo: the war! You can bet your bottom $ those WMD'S are somewhere in Syria!!!!!!!!!!
2007-07-23 14:18:39
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋
He finally admitted there were no WMD's. The reasons for going to Iraq given by this Administration have been numerous, WMD's, rid the people of Saddam a brutal dictator, to spread democracy. All complete nonsense. You know the real reason we invaded eh....
2007-07-23 21:22:42
·
answer #2
·
answered by Stephanie is awesome!! 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
The only two explanations that make any sense to me are:
1.) Complete, utter incompetence at the highest levels and lack of integrity in the career bureaucratic positions that should have kept them from going so far astray.
2.) Some sort of fundie, doomsday, fulfillment of "end-times" prophesy fantasy being played out by the "true believers" in the administration.
2007-07-23 21:25:28
·
answer #3
·
answered by gunplumber_462 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
I have always wondered why both sides run to 9/11 when talking to Iraq. If Iraq was a real threat, 9/11 would not be the cause for invading. Iraq being a threat unto itself would be the cause.
2007-07-23 21:08:31
·
answer #4
·
answered by The Stylish One 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
His Boys; Ted and Jeffy told Bush the God wanted him to "Get Saddam"
And Bush loves his Jeffy Boy
2007-07-23 21:13:00
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 2
·
2⤊
1⤋
Because Wolfowitz told him about the oil and... of course Paul loves Israel. But I am sure you already knew that.
2007-07-23 21:11:22
·
answer #6
·
answered by Page 4
·
4⤊
1⤋
because Israel and Aipac told him to, reason enough , a person always must do as their master dictates,
Anchee, your rebuttal is pretty worthless since every site you listed is not available, so you don't have any arguments, and you are wrong, no W,M,D, were ever found nor Chemical weapons ,
2007-07-23 21:05:51
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
You forgot that he staged 9/11. Silly Liberal
2007-07-23 21:02:34
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
4⤋
here is the reason below.http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,998512,00.html
2007-07-23 21:04:33
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋