Mohammad Sami VS Ajit Agarkar?

Question

Whose better?

Answer 1

ofcourse AJIT AGARKAR is the best

Answer 2

Mohammad Sami.

Answer 3

Definitely M Sami

Answer 4

Both are good Bowlers

Ajit Agarkar

India

Player profile
AJITH AGARKAR

Full name Ajit Bhalchandra Agarkar
Born December 4, 1977, Bombay (now Mumbai), Maharashtra
Current age 29 years 232 days
Major teams India, Middlesex, Mumbai
Batting style Right-hand bat
Bowling style Right-arm fast-medium

Statsguru Test player, ODI player

Slight, fiery and gifted, Ajit Agarkar is still coming to terms with being Kapil Dev's replacement as India's matchwinner with bat and ball. The ingredients are there, and in the right proportions, but are yet to form a heady and long-lasting mix. Agarkar's entry into international cricket - with an avalanche of wickets that made him the fastest to 50 in ODIs - was matched for speed only by an astonishing batting slump that saw him collect seven consecutive Test ducks against Australia. But India knows he can bat, because tailenders simply do not score half-centuries in 21 balls, as Agarkar did in a one-day game against Zimbabwe, or score Test centuries at Lord's, as Agarkar did in some style in 2002. His aggression is an asset, but the body cannot sometimes support it. He turned into a one-day specialist - arguably India's most effective ODI bowler in 2005-06 - but a disappointing World Cup campaign resulted in him being dropped for the Bangladesh series that followed.

MOHAMED SAMI
Full name Mohammad Sami
Born February 24, 1981, Karachi, Sind
Current age 26 years 150 days
Major teams Pakistan, Karachi, Kent, National Bank of Pakistan, Pakistan Customs
Batting style Right-hand bat
Bowling style Right-arm fast

Statsguru Test player, ODI player

One of a new generation of Pakistan fast bowlers, Mohammad Sami initially forced his way into the Test team with outstanding performances in domestic cricket and had an immediate impact in his first Test with five wickets against New Zealand. Then, in only his third Test, he notched a hat-trick, eking out the last three Sri Lankans in the Asian Test Championship final and he also has an ODI hat-trick. But since those early years, and especially after the World Cup 2003, when he was expected to become the Pakistan spearhead after the retirements of Wasim and Waqar, his story has been a fitful and thus far disappointing one.

Series after series has seen him disappoint as a stream of promising paceman have overtaken him, including the likes of Rana Naved-ul-Hasan, Umar Gul and Mohammad Asif. Occasionally when the mood takes him, he can be threatening, as he was for some of the India series in 2005, especially at Kolkatta and the occasional ODI. For the most part he has been surprisingly ineffective and prone to leaking runs. So poor was his form after the India series in early 2006, he was finally dropped from the tour to Sri Lanka was lucky to be selected for the tour to England that summer, after a number of Pakistan's frontline bowlers were injured.

Nobody seems to be entirely sure where the problem lies either - he has been given the new-ball with license to attack, he has come on as first-change. He is fit - one of the fittest in the team - and athletic. From a shortish run-up and high action he generates surprising pace, settled in the mid-to-late eighties but with occasional forays into the nineties. He also quickly mastered traditional outswing and reverse-swing and bowls a mean yorker. Some say it is a confidence thing but a bowling average of nearly 50 after 26 Tests (and a strike rate of over 80) means that opportunities might be limited when other pacemen are fit again. It would have been an unthinkable thought when he took eight wickets on his Test debut

Answer 5

Mohammad Sami, the Pakistani bowlers are generally better.

Answer 6

Mohammad Sami is the prominant player for sure

Answer 7

Of course Ajit Agarkar. It is the requirement of cricket that a bowler must be consistance to get wicket rather than going for speed and attack.

Answer 8

Shane Watson becz he has accomplished with the ball besides as with the bat so he's sweet. Ajit Agarkar is sturdy bowler yet with the bat he has no longer accomplished as many situations as Shane Watson.

Answer 9

Ajit Agarkar.... has better average and better per match wicket taken average only less then bracken and bond

Answer 10

Huh...... what an easy quesion is this........

no dout M.Sami is far better than A.Agarkar, coz of his speed bowling & always challanging the batsmen.......

Agrkar does not challange the batsmen. He just does the bowling coz he has been asked to do so........