That men have the right to legislate what women do with their bodies and minds. From the control freaks in the middle east legislating the size of the head scarf women are suppose to wear to when they are ready to get married. Who they can marry and treated as a deficient person that is okay to be mean to.
would men stand for another government official telling them what they can do?
2007-07-23 09:51:25
·
answer #1
·
answered by Steven 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
Oh probably that men often condemned for being rational, while women are forgiven their illogic.
For example, the issue of 'Studs vrs Sluts'
Single motherhood is a very hard. So it makes sense for women to be choosy when it comes to relationships that might result in motherhood.
Men die genetically unless they can talk a woman having sex with them. So it makes sense that a 'good salesman' would receive some admiration.
Which means 'Studs vrs Sluts' isn't a double standard, it's different standards for different things.
However, when I rationally explain to a feminist, that she's engaged in irrational whining, somehow I'm the bad guy.
Go figure. ;-)
2007-07-23 10:42:00
·
answer #2
·
answered by Phoenix Quill 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
The fact that anyone can be immensely prejudical against people that are not in a power minority status (e.g people from the west world, especially USA, bosses, men in general, etc) and just get praise. Any stupid derogoratory comment on americans or any other people from the western world (I'm from Sweden mysef) is fine .
But as soon as you even DISCUSS - without even stating an opinion on - power minority groups such as arabs, africans, women or children, you are an intolerant, prejudical fascist disgust. Now, do I hate that double standard or do I hate that double standard
2007-07-23 09:53:24
·
answer #3
·
answered by Olov K 1
·
0⤊
1⤋
I continually thought i became the only one that observed this. i'm no longer gay and that i'm surely hispanic and characteristic black acquaintances and that they are very homophobic for some reason, yet having stated that they preserve on with the hip hop custom which particularly does no longer settle for gay people so as that must be a start up.
2016-10-09 07:27:12
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I totally agree with Paul in San Diego! But I'd also like to add my take on it: black people can not only call EACH OTHER the "n" word in public, but they can also call white people crackers and honkeys and what-not. But let one white person say something that sounds like it could have some sort of a remote racial meaning behind it, they're on TV two hours later giving a public apology. Umm, confuse me!?
2007-07-23 09:55:29
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
The race card. Whenever something bad happens and the accused is black, Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton come out of the woodwork, pointing their fingers and shouting "racist".
It's like the Mike Vick thing. There are lots of people - mostly if not all black - who think that Mike Vick is being targeted with federal indictments because he is black. Never mind that he tortured and brutally killed several dogs, and ran a dog fighting ring out of his home (allegedly).
2007-07-23 09:52:12
·
answer #6
·
answered by Paul in San Diego 7
·
3⤊
1⤋
I agree with Sway 27. Men -studs, women-sluts
2007-07-23 09:49:43
·
answer #7
·
answered by basmusiq 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
The gender wage gap
2007-07-23 09:49:02
·
answer #8
·
answered by suzanne g 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
that females can call another female pretty without being thought of as gay. But when men call another male handsome they get their sexual preferances questioned.
Im not a guy, I just think it's unfair to them.
2007-07-23 09:49:38
·
answer #9
·
answered by ♥ Gabbie ♥ 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
That private citizens are bound by laws but high-ranking government officials are not.
2007-07-23 09:48:30
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋