Restrictions are curtailing our freedoms and ruining life for the General Public.
2007-07-23 08:58:55 · 12 answers · asked by charlaxhice 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
im thinking of camping in a public place like a park there are NO facilites at all for the homeless???
2007-07-23 09:06:45 · update #1
im thinking of camping in a public place like a park there are NO facilites at all for the homeless???
2007-07-23 09:07:17 · update #2
I agree the direction we're heading in is bad.
It's just a question of whether we can salvage the country, and go back to being the land of the free.
2007-07-23 09:01:38 · answer #1 · answered by coragryph 7 · 1⤊ 3⤋
exactly what "restrictions" are you referring too? or are you just spouting off your "opinion"?
There is nothing you can't do today, that you couldn't do 20 years ago. Yes, we have more security screening at airports, but you can still fly. I do agree that the "patriot act" is wrong, and I believe it will be tossed out after the next election. But it doesn't stop you from enjoying your freedoms. As for homeless camping in the parks, no one wants them there. The whole "homeless" issue is a farce. 80% of the homeless are there by choice. I've seen em pan handling right in front of a fast food restraunt with a help wanted sign in the window. I've stopped and offered em a temporary job working at some landscaping, washing cars etc etc just to give them a sense of pride and a chance to earn some money. Not one of them have accepted my offer. Some, just ignored me, some insulted me and some "demanded" change. I have watched these guys walking to a corner carrying a crutch, then once there, dig out a sign saying they were a veteran, slip a fake brace on their leg and start hobbling on the crutch to con people out of money for there drugs and alchohol. If they were vets, the'd have a retirement income, and a place for medical care and access to housing. They are cons. A small percentage of people are truly homeless and need a hand up ( not a hand out) which is available to them. Another percentage are mentally ill, and they truly need our help.
Now, what other "restrictions" and ruined "freedoms" are you trying to bring up?
I don't know anyone who has had their freedoms curtailed (except criminals ) and as for the general public, name one person. Put up your "facts" or stop complaining over nothing.
2007-07-23 09:21:08 · answer #2 · answered by randy 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
that's extraordinarily possibly. The Weimar Republic had reached a state the place the funds grew to become into nicely worth approximately as much as that's in Zimbabwe immediately. ought to the greenback fall to a similar destiny, a rustic-extensive panic could ensue that could make us susceptible to a unmarried man or woman who promised to repair our glory and take care of us from our enemies. Hitler chosen the Jews because of the fact of non-public encounters he had early in existence. Whoever we've been given could probable do the comparable. a synthetic inner enemy is needed to regulate the inhabitants in united states. A distant places enemy could bind everybody mutually in an outstanding way, which isn't what's mandatory for a dictatorship to prevail. certainly one of those union creates an ecosystem of administration interior the inhabitants. Hitler mandatory to make the Germans worry their acquaintances so as to maintain the panic that "necessitated" his protection. once you seem on the reaction of a definite element of the inhabitants to our contemporary concern, that's straight forward to work out the way it ought to attain a tipping element if issues have been given markedly worse.
2016-12-10 19:42:48 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. Not true. The US is the most free society in the world. There will be no curtailing of freedom. 300 million people will see to it.
2007-07-23 09:05:14 · answer #4 · answered by regerugged 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Yep, and it will only get worse.
Why would you give the powers to the Exec branch that Bush has when your main competition is fake socialism? Thats all the ingredients for fascism, all we need now is someone to persecute. Since the largest terror threat right now is from White Supremicists and theyre gaining support like never before, I dont think it will be hard to find someone to persecute in the coming years.
Woohoo! We can thank both parties for the hell we're about to go through,
2007-07-23 09:07:09 · answer #5 · answered by Showtunes 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
I get it, you're trying to make the association of Bush and Hitler. Whenever left leaners try to make the case against Bush, they always pull out the Hitler card and try to blind everyone by it. But what restrictions and freedoms being curtailed are you talking about?
2007-07-23 09:07:32 · answer #6 · answered by Thegustaffa 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Name a restriction imposed that has curtailed your lifestyle?
You are too vague and uninformed.
2007-07-23 09:07:54 · answer #7 · answered by labdoctor 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
We do have the Constitution to keep the hands of power hungry politicians tied.
2007-07-23 09:02:16 · answer #8 · answered by civil_av8r 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
know whats funny about libs they all ways go to the Nazi card ...... read books like Animal farm and the black book of communisum then maybe you get a clue
2007-07-23 10:47:33 · answer #9 · answered by tom t 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Just in case you were curious, your rights do not extend to infringing upon somebody else's right to property.
2007-07-23 09:18:19 · answer #10 · answered by the_defiant_kulak 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋