We know the senior George Bush was openly talking favorably about the New World Order. Do any of you know whether or not his son, GWB, feels the same way? That is, is he OPEN about his feelings, which must also be in favor of the NWO?
2007-07-23 08:49:36 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
His actions speak louder than words. His immigration plan is proof of his globalist NWO intentions.
2007-07-23 08:55:48 · answer #1 · answered by Q 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Most of our current government is for the one world order.Plans are in place already,everyday our government brings us closer to their goal. Why do you think all of our jobs are being sent overseas. It will be so much easier for the elite to take over after they have driven us to our knees. First our jobs, our health and then our freedom. They are wearing us down bit by bit and the people sit their and listen to lies about the economy and unemployment. Every day thousands of people lose their homes, jobs and way of life. I am afraid it may already be to late.Now Bush has placed a new scare tactic. Anyone who openly disagrees with the war can be put in prison. Wake Up People!
2007-07-23 15:59:34 · answer #2 · answered by oldhag 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Bush did talk about a NWO. Which shows exactly where his mind is. In the gutter because the possibility of a so called NWO is slim to none. Stay out of the conspiracy theories. They make people retarded.
2007-07-23 15:59:13 · answer #3 · answered by Chsel 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
There are some questions that conspiracy theorists have never answered:
Why are these Shadow Organizations always trying to take over the world? Is that the only goal worth pursuing? Can't they think of anything more creative than that?
Even if we presume--or conclude--that they are trying to take over the world, why is this necessarily a bad thing? What if the Organization is trying to make everyone's lives better through better education and more money?
Anyway...I have just always found it curious that conspiracies are, almost by definition, negative in their connotations. I think it might have something to do with people who actively believe in conspiracy theories cannot conceive of a better tomorrow; to them the future holds only misery. *shrug*
2007-07-23 16:17:02 · answer #4 · answered by Mathsorcerer 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Hey this is too much for the dolts on Yahoo Answers!
2007-07-23 15:54:15 · answer #5 · answered by Hathor 4 · 0⤊ 3⤋