English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Let's face it.
1.) Prince Charles is more and more happier.
2.) on presentations in public he loveling holds Camillas hand ( never happen with Princess Di.)
3.) Camilla supports her husband and does not stand in the lights of media.
4.) Charley always seems to have a joke with her in public and both cheerfully laugh.
5.) Camilla has great attributes

So why not given em the chance to be in charge of the british kingdom?

2007-07-23 07:40:10 · 17 answers · asked by angelikabertrand64 5 in Society & Culture Royalty

To Raymo, I have studied European history as a minor in the USA University. Therefore, fallowing the British Monarchy and it's history has been on my daily passion. I am European and was born and raised in Germany. And my hobby lies in Aristrocracy and it's history. As such I know more than people think I do. Read my answers to past Royals questions!

2007-07-23 09:48:55 · update #1

Barath, I truly understand your feelings. I heard lots of positives and negatives while searching for answers about the Royals. Nevertheless, who knows what in particulary in the late 20th century their function will be? I think perhaps when British government will change or see a change in order perhaps than they will do without them. Just my opinion on that matter.

2007-07-23 09:51:11 · update #2

17 answers

Charles should NEVER become king.As head of the church how could he,it would be hypocritical of both of them and if the church accepted them it would be hypocritical of them too.I am not religious myself but a hypocrite is a hypocrite in any walk of life.It would be akin to offering me the job.As a none religious person how could I be head of the church.How could I condone religious beliefs put out by the organisation I am head of which affect the lives of millions of people when I don't believe them myself which Charles has already proved.One of their commandments is THOU SHALT NOT COMMIT ADULTERY.He has.

2007-07-23 22:32:52 · answer #1 · answered by AFDEE 3 · 2 1

You don't know much about the British Constitution.
Only the Monarch can be Head of State, Supreme Governor on Earth of the Church of England, Head of the Armed Forces, Head of the Judiciary, Monarch of the United Kingdom and all the other countries and territories, too many to mention here. The married partner of the Monarch is NOT a joint head of state. Camilla can only ever be the wife of The King. It has already been announced that She will become "The Princess Consort". She cannot and never will be "in charge of the British Kingdom".

2007-07-23 16:15:43 · answer #2 · answered by Raymo 6 · 3 1

Sorry, but I don't understand your question. It sounds as though you don't think Charles will be head of state after Queen Elizabeth dies, and that is not the case. Charles IS the Heir Apparent and will rule, unless he abdicates. But in order to abdicate, he must first assume the throne.
Camilla will never be a head of state. She is the queen-consort. Period. Nothing more. So it really doesn't matter what kind of attributes you think she has.

2007-07-24 00:49:27 · answer #3 · answered by old lady 7 · 2 0

Its a matter of complete indifference to me. If Camilla becomes Queen Consort or maintains her present titles will not alter or affect the lives of my family,me and, I suspect 99.9% of the British Public. My pay and lifestyle will remain the same.

2007-07-23 16:36:23 · answer #4 · answered by SkodaKat 4 · 0 0

HRH Prince Charles will be King when his Mother the present Queen dies.

Slowly, more people are coming to the support of Camilla.

There is no reason what-so-ever why Camilla should automatically become Queen Camilla when Charles takes the throne. She could simply keep her present title, but put HRH in front.

2007-07-23 14:49:59 · answer #5 · answered by Dragoner 4 · 4 2

For as long as i draw breath will NEVER accept that woman. I have great respect for the Queen but what they did to Diana was unforgivable. Charles should just have had the balls to marry her in the first place, whatever the cost.

2007-07-24 06:39:51 · answer #6 · answered by Crafty Cath 3 · 2 1

I don't and never have had a problem with Charles and Camilla's relationship and I would be happy for him to succeed the Queen and for Camilla to have whatever appropriate role.

2007-07-24 04:13:00 · answer #7 · answered by LillyB 7 · 1 2

i don't like Charles or his hussy, they destroyed Diana,all the royal family knew about charlie and Camilla' but they hoped Diana would stay silent about his affair,
and let it go on as Diana was told you just keep it quite,
the same as the queen had to when Phillip was having his affairs,

2007-07-23 19:46:46 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

prince charles will never be king of a united kingdom because when scotland votes for independence we will also vote for a republic so he will only be king of england and by the way dianas attributes were36 d much bigger than camillas

2007-07-23 17:53:29 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

I dont have any respect anymore for the royals , after Di's gone , I was very proud of them . I went to see the wedding for Di's and Fergis, so i dont really care anymore . sorry guys thats way i feel.

2007-07-23 16:47:54 · answer #10 · answered by Bharat P 3 · 2 1

fedest.com, questions and answers