Isn't it that 9/11 has been proven to be an inside job - it is just that main stream media doesn't cover it

Question

I mean - 80% of people believe anything their favorite media outlet presents.

It is no secret that mainstream media is bought and paid for at Government levels.

Example: The attack on Michael Moore after the release of "Sicko" CNN blasted him and said he fabricated findings only to come out a week later on Wolf Blitzer and apologize for lying and covering it up on behalf of the Health Insurance Companies.

World known Scholars and Physicists have found evidence of Thermite - which used in controlled demolition in the dust at all World Trade Center collapses.

They have proven there is no video of a plane hitting the Pentagon. The most secure building in America with hundreds of camera angles - yet not one image of a plane coming in or hitting.

They have documented people who worked for and were with Dick Cheney when he gave the order from his bunker to stand down - meaning - do not shoot down the hijacked planes.

In fact it has been proven. They just don't cover it!

They have already debunked the Popular Mechanics issue on debunking 9/11.

Look 70% of America knows and admits thatt hey have not been told the truth about 9/11.

So if I lose credibility from a couple of Yahoo users - oh well.

Lets not forget that all these Government powers and war came from one event!

So I think it is of vital importance to have all the answers - and not half truth or no truth at all in the worst attack on U.S. soil!

If there are questions that need to be answered - under oath - then answer them

If there is nothing to hide - then why do they hide!

Why do these people always come on and try to sway other people by saying they were there or I lost someone there.

THERE IS NO CLEAR IMAGE OF A PLANE HITTING THE PENTAGON!

PERIOD

Show me your video link to that because I would really like to see it.

I said nothing about FOX news

NEXT!

"a cruise missile could not have caused that much damage"

No - but our Government has many weapons in their lockers.

Ever heard of controlled mini nukes - or bunker busters

Blah Blah Blah

Meet the disinformation sheep America

Polls show 70% of America does not believe the Government about 9/11

So what - are the other 30% in here or what

Here are the people who did the study on the Thermite found at WTC

Not exactly tinfoil hat people!

http://twilightpines.com//index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=37&Itemid=35

Answer 1

Name of Person who debunked Popular Mechanics is David Ray Griffin. His newest book is DEBUNKING 9/11 DEBUNKING. His book uses examples set by the 9/11 Commission report, FEMA's report, NIST's report and Popular Mechanics along with anyone else who defends the official conspiracy theory. He just shows the facts using both sides of the argument to provide any answers.

If the government isn't hiding anything, then why are they hiding everything. Ms. Rice said on 9/23/01 that they have hard evidence to prove to link OBL to the 9/11 attacks. We're still waiting for that info. That and at FBI.gov they still don't show Mr. Bin Laden being responsible for 9/11. Other stuff yes, 9/11 no. There were over 70 security cameras at the Pentagon, yet we're only allowed to see 5 frames from one camera. Other surveillance cameras from nearby businesses were confiscated by the FBI just minutes after the Pentagon was struck. Why did WTC7 have molten metal where it collapsed just as did WTC 1 & 2 and wasn't struck by a plane?

You'll just believe what the corporate controlled media tells you, and you'll never ask questions and never do research to seek some answers.

You know, I don't know what happened, no one does. But I do know that news reporters were talking about secondary explosions in the buildings that day when it first happened. That was never seen again on tv. You can google it to see I'm not lying. Why did BBC report WTC7 collapsed 23min before it did?

JUST DO SOME FRICKEN RESEARCH AND STOP BELIEVING WHAT YOU'RE FED THROUGH THE BOOB TUBE. I'm not calling people names, just pissed that no one real examines the facts.

Oh, and to think that this would be too much of a secret for someone to conceal. Research the Manhattan Project and see how many were involved with that.

Answer 2

Obama pitching is the kind of fluff news that belongs at the very end of the newscast. And I think that is exactly how they treated that. Tiger Woods should only be a news story. I am especially disgusted with the way the media has obcessed over Tiger because on the very same evening that Tiger Woods crashed his car, there was a Thanksgiving massacre where a pregant woman, a 6 yr old child sleeping in her bed and an elderly woman were all murdered. And the killer was on the lose for over a month. The media hardly mentioned this because they were too busy repeating every insignificant detail about the Tiger Woods case!

Answer 3

In fact, you are wrong. If it were, you'd be providing us the facts that prove it, and not speculating on what the media says or rolling out a couple of long since debunked conspiracy theories. Michael Moore's dispute with CNN is totally irrelevant, and is based more in his attacks on the station. What does that have to do with 9/11? This is a great example of a "red herring" argument, which is one of the basic fallacies of logic. Nothing against "Sicko," which I thought was wonderful, but that has nothing to do with this debate.

The fact is that it is been proven that the 9/11 attacks were NOT an inside job. There is no evidence that backs that it was an inside job whatsoever. Everything that you provide here has been total speculation that has ignored thousands of pieces of evidence that contradict them. Everyone talks about the plane that supposedly wasn't seen hitting the Pentagon just because there is not a video, ignoring hundreds of eye-witness testimonies and the plane wreckage itself, and the fact that we DO have video of the plane that hit the second WTC, and they even uncovered one video of the plane hitting the first one. Two planes DID hit buildings, and another crashed, and yet we are supposed to one didn't hit the Pentagon just because a few theorists suggest it with no other evidence?

The article below disproves a lot of the other claims that have been made. Meanwhile, all the terrorists that were involved with the attacks have been identified, and their histories leading up to the attacks have been traced. And you go ask the families of the people who were on that plane that hit the Pentagon where their families went if the plane did NOT hit it. You'll get a lot of doors slammed in your face by angry and grieving people... if they don't rip you to shreds for being such an idiotic jerk.

p.s. I notice you say "they" debunked the Popular Mechanics article. Who are "they?" Don't know, do you? Because "they" don't really exist and "they" don't have any evidence. You attempt to shoot down everyone else's proof, but where is yours? You don't have any. Hmm...

Polls also showed as recent as three years ago that 70% of Americans said that Saddam Hussein was involved with the attacks, which had, of course, been proven wrong and was even admitted by Bush. So what does that stat prove? They could have lied to us, as many people believe, and still not been complicit in the attacks themselves. That argument does not even make any sense.

Answer 4

"Example: The attack on Michael Moore after the release of "Sicko" CNN blasted him and said he fabricated findings only to come out a week later on Wolf Blitzer and apologize for lying and covering it up on behalf of the Health Insurance Companies."

Funny, because Fox News, which Micheal Moore attacked in Fahrenheit 9/11, gave very positive reviews of Sicko. Guess you forgot to mention that because it doesn't fit your theory, eh?

"World known Scholars and Physicists have found evidence of Thermite - which used in controlled demolition in the dust at all World Trade Center collapses."

Excuse me, who?

"They have proven there is no video of a plane hitting the Pentagon. The most secure building in America with hundreds of camera angles - yet not one image of a plane coming in or hitting."

No, there is no video of a plane hitting the pentagon, but a cruise missile could not have caused that much damage.

"They have documented people who worked for and were with Dick Cheney when he gave the order from his bunker to stand down - meaning - do not shoot down the hijacked planes."

Are you saying the explanation that passengers on flight 93 DID in fact take down that plane? Then the government told the truth, huh? That goes against your theory as well.

If the government always lied, then why did the "No WMD in Iraq" report come out? Why WOULDN'T they lie about that?

Answer 5

If this were true, the liberally biased media would be all over it!
They never miss a chance to slam the current administration. I like the strength of your sources-Michael Moore(?) Your thoughts sound familiar. Wait a minute, a friend of mine was saying much of the same (the last time I visited him at the sanitarium). Thanks for all your "facts and evidence". By the way, did you know Bush and Cheney have constructed a Weather Control machine? It's a "fact". They used it for the first time to create Hurricane Katrina. Dude...Lay off the black-tar heroin!

Answer 6

first, all these answers so far...are all on the media. and that last one.."if i thought our govt did stuff like that, i would move" then i suggest you get out quickly, becuz our gov't is corrupt. may not be the most corrupt, but it definately decieves us everyday.
a conspiracy on that scale (9/11) is a bit extreme. inside job and all set up like hollywood..i dunno that would take a lot of people to be involved and i think a leak would have been earlier and probably a lil more exposure on the issue. i do think your crazy for saying it's proven..obviously not, bush is still in office, and so is a hell of a lot of other people. half the people that "would of" been involved proably had family that died in the accident... however, this is not the first time ive heard the exact things your saying from other people...where are you people getting your info..it sounds the same

Answer 7

I have watched them all. Is the government covering up alot of stuff yes! Did the government actually do 9/11 I doubt it. It would have been vastly easier to plant 2 55 gal. drums of VX nerve gas in Iraq and prevent Bush from looking like a fool. Or set up a few faux Al-Queda training camps over there.

Answer 8

I have seen all the videos that set out to prove that 9/11 was some grand conspiracy. Not one has done so.

Here is a thought to ponder. To accomplish what the conspiracy theory supporters claim would take a lot of people. The cover up would have to be 100%. This from a government that the same conspiracy theory supporters claim is full of leaks. Hmmm. Does not make sense to me.

Note: The frames of the pentegon vidoe are about 1 second apart. A plane traveling at 500 MPH covers over 700 feet per second. This equates to over 12 feet during a shoot using a speed of 1/60 (pretty standard for security cameras) If the plane were even in frame during a shot, the movement would not show a plane, just a silver blur (which it did). Additionally, missles (the big theory on what took out the pentegon) have a flame trail. Don't see one of those...

Answer 9

I think in extraordinary times people look for extraoridinary answers. Generally I find the truth to lie somewere in the middle.
It is my opinion if our government was directly responsible for the attacks in 2001 than we would all be living under a flag of tyranny, as this is not the case, I believe a combination of poor governance & corruption has gotten us to where we are today!

Answer 10

I think the reason they dont cover it is because they dont want to offend the families of those lost in the attack

I also believe that if it were proven that it was an inside job america would turn on its head and anarchy would reign. Imagine finding out that americans allowed their people to be killed and then turned around and killed people in other countries because of it we would lose the trust of our people and the world.

Lastly, there will always be a concpiracy theory so people become numb to them and cast them away. DId we really land on the moon? Maybe maybe not the fact that we cannot prove or disprove it makes us favor towards how we want to see our government which is just and righteous.