Will the Democrats throw this election?

Question

Because the economy was starting to tank right at end of Clinton's time in office and the Democrats didn't want to take the hit they ran such a bad campaign Gore lost to Bush. Even their pseudo questioning of the Florida count didn't make sense. They were by law granted an automatic recount of the entire state and they chose to cherry pick recounts ONLY where they already had a wide margin didn't make sense.

Democrats have complained about Bush's handling of the economy since day one and yet the market has been repeatedly hitting all time highs.

Sooner or later the market will take a big hit. It won't be Bush's fault if it happens on his watch. He doesn't actually control the economy anyway. But if the economy stays good through most of next year will they run another bad campaign so their person doesn't get elected again?

Think about it. IF the market stays up, and interest rates and unemployment stay low till after the election and there is a Democrat elected. How are they going to say it's not our fault? Democrats will probably maintain control of Congress and they will have the White House to boot. They won't be able to point fingers at anyone but themselves.

Answer 1

All they need is to find an elitist snob who represents absolutely nobody in America.

...oh wait...they already used that one in 2004.

Given the stable, sustained growth over the last few years, it would take a real tool to mess it up. Maybe Obama will give us another recession or Hillary could blow up another bubble-economy like Bill did.

Answer 2

No, definitely no longer. Democrats want ability notably else. interior the common technique the fringes of the occasion rule the day. They publish a non-severe contender on account that became the perfect that they had keen to run. they could have accomplished extra suited to publish a extra energetic, extra charasmatic candidate. Had John Edwards been the nominee he could have possibly won. Now he's broken products. Frankly niether Hillary or Barry Obama (He used to flow by making use of Barry ya understand) have the journey to be taken heavily and that they're going to the two lose each thing south of the Mason Dixon line. Frankly i think of the whole ingredient is a large number on the two factors precise now.

Answer 3

The presidential election probably /is/ the Democrat's to lose - that is, they'd have to screw up for a Republican to have a shot.

I doubt they'd screw up intentionally, though they might decline to run an 'electible' candidate, if they felt there was more to be gained in '12 vs an incumbent who was forced to preside over a defeat in Iraq, for instance.

That doesn't strike me as too likely, beating an incumbent is always harder, and there's still a chance that Iraq will fall on Bush's watch - or, worse (from the Democrat PoV), could be salvaged if another republican were given 4 more years to try to win it.

Answer 4

the democrats are in fact going to throw away this presidential election
regardless of the current president's incompetence, the economy is doing great
furthermore, the people they are trying to nominate are not good candidates
Hillary, i mean come on, wat a joke!
shes a candidate that America dislikes. 51% have an unfavorable opinion of her
how can she win an election when half of the nations people dont like her? as for Obama, some people are not ready to have a minority president
but other than that
his lack of experience may be a problem
and John Edwards, well he chose to run against two of the top democratic people so my guess he'll run for Vice-president
the republicans will destroy Hillary's campaign since it is most likely she will run as the democratic candidate
the republicans will destroy her just as they destroyed her health care plan in 1994

Answer 5

Stock market price is only one factor in the economy. There are many others that say we are not doing very well now: national debt, budget deficit, lack of investment, travel to US, loss of manufacturing jobs, home sales and GAS prices. It's only a matter of time before the economy tanks and could happen any time the Chinese call in the loans. The Democrats won't throw the election, because getting out of Iraq and changing the administration is more important than short-term economic measures. I would pay more careful attention to Rove & Cheney, who could once again manipulate the election in Republican favor.

Wake up and get rid of this administration. Remember, everything that's happened under Bush is his responsibility (9/11, Katrina response, wire taps, Gitmo, Abu Ghraib, I could go on for hours like this). Unless you make $500,000 a year, this administration hasn't done you any good.

Answer 6

Seriously, this is one of the dumbest things I have ever heard....Gore lost by one state...they did not throw the election. Not to mention, there is never going to be a time when someone can take over and everything will be perfect when they come into office.

Answer 7

You said it yourself, the president cannot control the economy, so why would the Democrats be afraid of an economic downturn during their riegn? They wouldn't, any and all economic issues will be blamed on Bush anyway.

Answer 8

Your masters give you this crap to repeat to make a fool of yourself with. This is baseless right wing propagnda at its most vulagar.

The market works for the rich, not nobodies like you.

Clinton bailed us out of Bush41's mess and 12 years of Reaganomics. This senseless Democrat bashing is getting old.

Answer 9

They should throw it and let a republican try and clean up all of bush's messes!

Answer 10

blah blah blah

Republicans - good Democrats - bad , Part MMMMMIX