You saw what happened to Rudolph Guiliani's political career after 9/11.
Isn't he running for President?
Now they are warning us of a "Summer Attack"
Gee, I wonder what state they will stage that in?
They will also be looking for more of a physcological effect, so the West coast makes sense for them.
The whole East Coast - West Coast thing
New York was hit so what better State for them to attack than California and have Arnold in the same spotlight Rudolph Guiliani had.
Arnold has had closed door meeting with Karl Rove and I would call that a red flag. Arnold said he dreams of ruling a Nation, Bush and Rove have said Arnold would make a great President.
But to do that he needs something big to be able to earn changing the Constitution so a foreign born cadidate can run.
Right now Arnold can't run.
An attack there would really help his cause now wouldn't it!
Bringing the State of California together after a terrible tragedy.
You watch - it is coming
2007-07-23 05:35:55 · 9 answers · asked by scottanthonydavis 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Did you read that crap below - either they didn't read the question or they don't care that a terror act could help allow Arnold to run!
The guy injected Steroids - please - don't even try to argue that point
He is on film smoking pot
And we was accused by more than one women for groping - that means he grabbed her without consent
And these people say he would be a great President!
Good Lord
Rediculous!
2007-07-23 06:33:34 · update #1
I'll give you 2-to-1 odds that you're right.
And I'll up the specific -- the "attack" will be in southern California -- San Diego or Los Angeles. It will be in the early spring, around March.
And it will be narrowly foiled by the joint efforts of federal agents and state law enforcement, who will manage to contain the damage so that only a few hundred people are killed.....
That's my SWAG prediction.
2007-07-23 05:39:50 · answer #1 · answered by coragryph 7 · 4⤊ 1⤋
Governor, Mayor, or CEO, are all good journey to be an govt. it is approximately making the acceptable determination, not in ordinary terms vote casting for some thing and hoping that adequate individuals vote the comparable to get it performed. it is likewise approximately having and making use of veto power. As a Senator, you quite often have an excuse why what you promised did not come to fruition. As a Governor, in case you get the legislations put in front of you to sign, and you do not, it is your fault.
2016-12-14 16:44:15 · answer #2 · answered by schebel 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It would certainly make some sense to attack SF or LA - though DC and NY are still very attractive, internationally-known targets. SF has a broadly recognizeable landmark, but, attacking it wouldn't get you WTC level casualties. LA doesn't really (maybe the Hollywood sign - that wouldn't kill anyone), but a mass-casualty attack (chemical or maybe radiological) there could work, especially if you managed to kill some celebs.
Whatever it is, it would ideally have to surpass 9/11 - since that's what Al Qaeda keeps promising. I don't think that's too likely at this point.
2007-07-23 05:46:10 · answer #3 · answered by B.Kevorkian 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Arnold Schwarzenegger cannont be US President as he was not born in the US. That would take a Constitutional amendment. Unlikely to happen.
That said, he certainly would, if he could, be better than any of the current list of GOP presidential candidates. He seems to be a good governor for California.
2007-07-23 06:29:39 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Arnold as president I doubt its going to happen. Attack in Cali I cant really imagine anything as dramatic as 9/11. They would have to detonate a dirty bomb or something to get the same attention. If they did a biological attack then the government will just cover it up saying something like all these are related to some cows going poo next to the spinach patch.
2007-07-23 05:43:25 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Well, watch for a Constitutional amendment, because otherwise, Arnold cannot be President of the USA. But if there is, we could possibly do worse. One former governor of California did pretty good.
2007-07-23 05:40:28 · answer #6 · answered by marconprograms 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Now don't let your paranoia run away with you. This isn't one of Arnold's movies. Amending the constitution is VERY difficult. Once you convince Congress, which is no piece of cake, you have to get two thirds of state legislatures to ratify it. That's just not going to happen.
2007-07-23 05:45:06 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
do you eat paint chips?? or just chew on them??
2007-07-23 05:41:44 · answer #8 · answered by arwilcox187 2 · 1⤊ 3⤋
your retarded
2007-07-23 05:40:09 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 4⤋