Even if this was "legal", why is Hillary's brother involved in taking money from felons?
http://edition.cnn.com/2001/ALLPOLITICS/02/24/pardons.rodham/index.html
2007-07-23 05:23:33 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I am 100% sure of this answer. NOOOO!!! I must state that I am not a republican, but I am conservative. But it should be obvious to anyone who is not an idiot and who is not blinding themselves to the truth that this couple is crooked!!!
2007-07-23 05:28:30 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 0⤋
In a WORD = NO! BUT, Presidential pardons over the years have been used for numerous people of ill-repute by a number of Presidents. I do not agree with Clinton's stand on very much but this one is not the place to insert the ethics probe. This is another symptom not the problem.
Also....Remember that is brother is not poster-child for the sweaky clean.
2007-07-23 12:30:00 · answer #2 · answered by jprentice3 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
lol, let me give you a few questions to substantiate your question, further:
Did Bill Clinton sit and lie bald faced to Congress?
Did Bill Clinton sell techical secrets to China?
Did Bill Clinton lie to the USA about his affairs?
Did Bill Clinton have rape charges filed against him?
Did Bill Clinton have sexual harassment charges filed against him?
Did Bill Clinton make illegal business dealings in the Whitewater case?
On what platform did Bill Clinton get into office, swearing he would provide it for the entire USA in his first run?
Was the American public stupid enough to vote for Clinton after he didnt do what he promised in his first election?
Did Hillary lie to the USA about her vote for the war?
Is Hillary now trying to flipflop and say that she wouldnt have voted for the war, had she been President?
Do you honestly trust these two? If so, HOW? WHY?
These two represent the slimiest of the slimy.
2007-07-23 12:31:36 · answer #3 · answered by Noone i 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
The Clintons are not ethical. They are not in Bush's league --Bush would have to lower his standards
2007-07-23 14:34:20 · answer #4 · answered by RK 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would elect a Clinton dog catcher if you tied a raw steak around their neck.
2007-07-23 12:26:27 · answer #5 · answered by cornbread 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
The question answers itself.
Youre talking about the Clintons, end of story.
2007-07-23 12:26:19 · answer #6 · answered by vinny_says_relax 7 · 8⤊ 0⤋
the clinton's arent anymore ethical than any other political family..... they would all steal, lie, cheat and kill to get what they want.
2007-07-23 12:28:52 · answer #7 · answered by bytchy_princess 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The Clintons aren't in the same league as Bush, not even close, but still they're major sleaze bags..
2007-07-23 12:28:45 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
Well, it looks like the Kennedy legacy is alive and well.
2007-07-23 12:28:44 · answer #9 · answered by Greg 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
This is par for the course, no its not ethical.
2007-07-23 12:27:31 · answer #10 · answered by ? 7 · 4⤊ 0⤋