Issac Herzog said so yesterday.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isaac_Herzog
Isn't he giving Mahmoud too much credit? After all Mahmoud is not pulling the strings in Tehran.
2007-07-23 04:56:08 · 9 answers · asked by Page 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Comrade the all know:
I heard it on VOA.
2007-07-23 05:05:10 · update #1
not yet,,but when he lives long enough to get nucler bombs ,he will be.or should I say if he lives..as good as he looks in those suits,hee,heee.chow,,freepress
2007-07-23 05:22:57 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
True enough that he isn't even the one actually in charge in Iran. He's a good publicist for what the clerics want him to say, but you are definately right has no power of his own. At the same time, he hasn't done much. Hasn't started any wars, hasn't sponsored any terrorist attacks, hasn't really been all that agressive. Essentially, he is at most a Persian Gulf problem and probably simply a danger to Iran: but definately not a global danger of any degree.
2007-07-23 12:04:46 · answer #2 · answered by C.S. 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Ahmadinejad is not as strong within Iran as perceived by the west. The President of Iran is more or less a figurehead and the religious leaders are calling the shots. Ahmadinejad is just being a mouth piece.
The real danger is from the religious leadership behind him because they are actually calling the shots.
2007-07-23 12:04:24 · answer #3 · answered by The Stylish One 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I would say that Bush, Dick Cheney, and the Zionist powers that be are the most dangerous people in the world. They are the ones that enslave us all, and keep us brainwashed through the media that they own and control.
2007-07-23 12:04:27 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Kim Jong-Il is likely the most dangerous man. You kinda get the feeling he might just up and say "screw it" and start lobbing nukes.
2007-07-23 12:07:55 · answer #5 · answered by John L 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I would say George Soros
http://www.frontpagemagazine.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=24032
(See? coragryph below is a perfect example of the ravages that Soro's has wrought.)
2007-07-23 11:58:58 · answer #6 · answered by Chris Chong Kim 1 · 2⤊ 1⤋
No.
He's just another hard-line leader doing what his people wants -- protecting them at all costs from their perceived enemies, ignoring international opinion in the process.
No different than the current US leaders.
2007-07-23 12:03:44 · answer #7 · answered by coragryph 7 · 3⤊ 2⤋
No. The Ayatollah is more dangerous.
2007-07-23 11:59:20 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
"No, BUSH IS!!! HAHA IM SO FUNNY"
had to say that before some liberal did.
but you're right.
2007-07-23 12:04:27 · answer #9 · answered by null 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋