http://games.espn.go.com/nba/features/traderesult?players=515~165~383~25~849&teams=23~7~7~18~18
2007-07-23 04:47:52 · 6 answers · asked by Jasmus M 2 in Sports ➔ Basketball
i like the trade denver would get da best out of it cause kenyon martin is always injured and they get jamal crawford whos a good offensive player but the new york knicks wouldnt get a really good deal out of it cause they lose a player who can score really well(jamal crawfor) and get ron artest a person wit legal issue on top dat he missing the first 7 days of the b-ball season
2007-07-23 04:56:20 · answer #1 · answered by dmx2k304 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The kings give up kenny thomas' huge contract (wonder how he got that) for kenyon martin who is a team killer. Thats bad for both sides. The knicks are ok giving up crawford for artest but the fact is that artest wants to stay in sacremento.
Ok trade 7/10
2007-07-23 07:54:13 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
why would the Kings want a broken down shell of a player like Martin. You must be a knicks fan.
2007-07-23 04:55:43 · answer #3 · answered by hurricanes 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
not bad but i think the those teams involved should worry more about their team chemistry need to get better before more trades are made.... you can trade n sign all the players u want but that dosent est chemistry
2007-07-23 05:16:12 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Kings would be the winners, Knicks the losers, and the Nuggets have just kissed their sister, it would be a push.
2007-07-23 04:54:49 · answer #5 · answered by Frizzer 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
that would be terrible
2007-07-23 04:54:26 · answer #6 · answered by J Dub 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋