which is worse: A man who 'terrorizes' young children...?

Question

...or his wife who knows he does it and still allows him unsupervised visits

Answer 1

Knowingly putting a kid with that guy is worse, the wife that knows he's a monster but allows for the unsupervised visits. She should lose custody, and they both should be forced into a supervised visit situation IF they get to see their kid(s) again.

Answer 2

Oh, both. In recent cases where one or the other parent was charged with harming their children, I think in most cases BOTH parents should have been charged. This includes the case of Andrea Yates and the murders of her 5 young children. Her defense was severe post par tum depression. I can see where she may have been 'around the bend' as they say, but she did in fact take the children's lives. But her husband had to have been aware there were serious problems long before the fact and yet he just walked away... not only from the problem but also the final outcome.

I don't know if anyone remembers the Joel Steinberg circus in N.Y. [USA] quite a few years ago, but it a a highly televised murder trial. He had taken the life of his very young daughter while under the influence of a cocaine addiction. His wife, who was a battered wife, and is in fact I believe, the originator of the phrase 'battered wife syndrome' received very little time in the outcome because she was traumatised and unable to defend her child against the continuing abuse. I didn't understand then and still do not, how one allows that to happen not only to oneself but particularly to a child.

Answer 3

The man. I went through this and begged the court to make all visits supervised and instead they gave him an extra day of visitations plus more hours on the other days! This went on for years, and people were saying that I was allowing her to go on the visits. I tried not letting her go but the police said they would put me in jail for violation of visitation and he would have her even longer! Very sad situations when there is a pervert getting his way.♥j

Answer 4

A man who terrorizes children while the wife knows it and does nothing.

Answer 5

They are both scum and just as bad as the other. But I think the man should get a more harsh jail sentence since he is inflicting the terror on the child. And be sure not to put him in solitary confinement, his chances of survival in general population would be more interesting.

Answer 6

this may well be a ghost or he could have some psychological problems. i could have him examined by making use of a psychiatrist that believes interior the mystical. Now this may well be a a recommend poltergeist. I poltergeist is a sort of ghost that latches directly to young babies with a great style of rigidity. it extremely is uncommon for a poltergeist to latch directly to somebody that youthful yet no longer unparalleled. it may additionally be a demon yet demons could do extra then tell your son to throw stuff at you. Get the living house inspected by making use of a magical study team, they shoulden't fee you. sturdy success

Answer 7

When you say terrorizes, as in he is a pedophile? Then he is more dangerous but the wife needs to be locked up for allowing him to do it and putting the kids in danger. They think they are EQUALLY as bad.

Answer 8

A mother should protect her children from him. I was in that situation & got restraining orders for my girls. The man should not be allowed to have any contact.

They are equally at fault if she won't do anything to stop it.

Answer 9

They are BOTH equally reprehensible, and should both be held accountable.

The man may be verbally abusing his children (if he is careful not to touch them physically), but his wife IS an accessory, and is equally culpable.

Answer 10

The man. The woman is probably scared of him and is not actively hurting the children. He is worse for actually hurting the children.