English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

July 22, 2007 -- One of the high-priced lawyers who have sucked $47 million out of the $1 billion World Trade Center insurance fund is infamous for defending companies that manufactured Agent Orange, a pregnancy drug linked to cancer, and defective breast implants.

James Tyrrell, a partner in the law firm Patton Boggs, is hailed in legal circles as the "master of disaster" and the "devil's advocate."

See link - http://www.nypost.com/seven/07222007/news/regionalnews/wtc_lawyer_the_devils_advocate_regionalnews_susan_edelman.htm?page=0

Question - What are your thoughts on this ?

2007-07-22 20:00:09 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Government

2 answers

If you have evidence, a suit could be filed against the culprit/s in the irregularities.

2007-07-22 22:06:21 · answer #1 · answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7 · 1 0

Boy, you're no longer afraid to open a huge can of worms, are you, lol? that's interesting how some human beings will blame the "breed" for any damaging habit of their canines whilst ninety% of the time it became the tip results of little or no (or undesirable) education. yet no longer all canines of a given breed have the comparable point of breed features. Take German Shepherds working example. no longer all GSDs have a severe working force. you have one that DOES want a job or they are going to force you nuts. then you somewhat will discover one that is a entire sofa potato, prepared to snooze with you in front of the television till dinnertime. comparable for cover. maximum GSDs are of course retaining, and want no education to alarm bark (now and back too lots), yet you will are available the process one now and then with out interest in guarding. i've got faith that's in lots of cases a solid thought to maintain a canines breed in recommendations, because of the fact particular breeds DO have organic features that isn't be properly suited with what a guy or woman needs of their canines. and education can in straightforward terms do lots in case you have a canines with an somewhat severe force to do something you do no longer want them to do. a solid coach can administration in simple terms approximately any canines habit with adequate artwork. yet education can no longer replace a canines person-friendly character. A dominant canines will consistently be a dominant canines, whether they are taught that they are able to no longer dominate their proprietor. A submissive canines will consistently be submissive, etc. Socialization can shop a shy canines from being overly fearfull, or an agressive canines from turning out to be to be a vicious danger, yet those person-friendly character features are nevertheless going to be there.

2016-12-10 19:14:42 · answer #2 · answered by leissa 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers