English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NWwrEEP8EBk http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iyjAhEhLXag

2007-07-22 19:48:36 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

axel foley, you mean like that piece of crap the history chanel put out on 9/11? they might as well of told us that we all are crazy. watch the videos, learn somthing

2007-07-22 20:01:13 · update #1

dan s below, sorry, wrong answer. but your welcome to watch the videos anyway and learn somthing.

2007-07-22 20:05:04 · update #2

8 answers

There was one--the truck bomb.

Tune into the Discovery Times channel for a fully-thought out documentary on conspiracy theories about the Oklahoma City bombing.

2007-07-22 19:54:57 · answer #1 · answered by Axel Foley 1 · 0 0

One, only one.

Just six hours ago I watched a documentary on it presented on the Discovery Times Channel. One bomb was made, and exploded in the same situation and analyzed. The result is that one bomb could have caused the damage, even the second shock wave.

The federal officials that worked in the complex did have explosives in the building; examples used for instruction; so they might have been detonated as well, none were recovered and it is not known who many or how much was in the building.

The government for some reason refuses to release the video tape of the explosion. They are not telling us all that happened.

The extra explosives in the building and the iffy state of each column are a reasonable explanation for the asymmetrical explosion. The extra column that failed could have remained standing. Examining the others show that it could have gone either way. If the extra explosives were present then that could have created the additional column failure as well. The variables are all accounted for and the FBI explosives experts are satisfied with the case and the conclusion.

There was only one truck bomb, and Timothy McVeigh set it off, but we don't know all the details. I don't know what is being hidden, but at a rough guess it is some gory detail like a body being ripped apart. Enough people would object to that being released that it would be reasonable to expect the government to withhold the tape.

Axel Foley and I must have been watching the same TV show today. I watched it when it first came out, so I saw it for a second time today.

2007-07-23 02:59:48 · answer #2 · answered by Dan S 7 · 0 1

I always thought it was one huge truck bomb. But, if there were bombs inside the building, could they not have been planted by the same group that were accused of arranging the truck bomb?

What would have been the purpose of the government planting these bombs and arranging these explosions? What would they have gained from it?

This is one conspiracy theory that eludes me, because I can't see one advantage to the government for conspiring to do this. Also, wouldn't McVeigh have protested his innocence? He went to his death glaring at the people watching. And the co-conspirator entered a guilty plea, I believe, and was imprisoned.

I can't think of a single advantage for anyone other than a malcontent militia member angry about Waco and Ruby Ridge to do this. Perhaps there is an advantage that I don't know about, but I have no idea what that could be.

2007-07-23 07:07:48 · answer #3 · answered by Me, Too 6 · 0 0

According to news reports of the day there were no bombs inside the Federal building on the day of the bombing. All bombs were located in a truck outside the Federal building and the volume of explosive material was so huge that it took out the entire front end of the building.

2007-07-23 04:12:38 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

there were no bombs inside the building it was all inside the ryder truck parked outside the building and the truck was filled with the bombs
if you want some good details check out the book "simple truths"

2007-07-26 22:06:20 · answer #5 · answered by ouangel77 3 · 0 0

There were 6.

2007-07-23 02:50:54 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

0, I thought it was a truck parked outside filled with explosives

2007-07-23 02:53:05 · answer #7 · answered by Galahad 2 · 0 0

the building didn't really blow up it was just a bush excuse to go after saddam, oh yeah, nevermind

2007-07-23 03:37:24 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers