Liberals:If Bush is as bad as Hitler,then answer me this.?

Question

Does anything Bush ever did campare by a fraction to Opperation Reinhardt? Infact can any of you even tell me what Opperation Reinhardt was? Why don't any of you ever study history before comparing it to current events?

Coragrypgh.He is not holding them based on race of religion,he is holding them as POW's for interrogation at places like Guantanamo because civilian courts have already demonstrated that they don't wan't to fight the war on terror.

Aleem D.Those incidents where our troops killed civilians were accidental or were commited by a few bad apples in our military.Most civilians were killed by Iraqi's,not by us and we aren't putting a gun to their heads and telling them to kill each other.And yes those bad apples do get punshed all though the media will not want to tell you that.

Yo pey.If Bush is only worried about oil then why doesn't he redeploy all troops and have them gaurd the oil wells and let the rest of the country go all to hell? And last time I checked there has not been a terrorist attack on U.S. soil since 9/11 and a lot of terror plots were foiled.So maybe he is doing whats best for his fellow Americans.

Bombs_away_today
I was turned down for military service due to an eye injury.Looks like I'm not the coward you want me to be.

Kristen M.You make a good point but I sometimes find it best to play dirty just like my opponents do.But I have not personally met much liberals with historical knowledge.Infact these answers on this page is the most I'v seen with historical knowledge.

corogryph: federal law does not protect terrorists and they are also not protected by the geneva convention.And you're right,the courts are capable of handling this but they just simply refuse to take it seriously

Bombs_away_today
This thing about oil.Before we went into Iraq Saddam Hussien said the U.S. is only after the oil.Next thing I know,people over here start saying the same thing.Call me stupid for believing my own government.But you are actually taking Saddams word over our own government.You watch too many hollywood movies bro.

garstar,speak for yourself.Notice how I spell don't.Now compare.

Answer 1

It's unfair to lump all Liberals in the "ignorant/i think bush is as bad as hitler" category. I've found that most liberals are more knowledgeable when it comes to politics and historical events than most conservatives. Conservatives do tend to bring more emotion into their telling of "historical events" and "factual arguments" than most liberals. Personally, I probably lay more toward the liberal side, but i more or less ride the fence. I'm not a democrat nor a republican. I simply go with the best points and what i feel will better the country. Just wanted to mention that even though i didn't answer your question. I just feel that if you're going to ask for an answer based on opinions, your question should at least show that you're some what open minded and open to a difference of opinion. You were extremely accusatory, and showed that you more than likely will not accept anything you're told regardless of the response.

Answer 2

Take a look at the Nirenberg trial photos, then tell us that Bush is like Hitler. If he is,, than Hillary is Eva Brawn, now that is more valid a comparison.
It was terrible what Hitler did to the Jews and other ethnic groups. It is shameful that the Dem's have no respect for Jews and the sorrowful memories of those who lost loved ones.
But then didn't they, in the past years, make a political event out of someones funeral.
Peoples lives have been ruined by Hillary and her nut spell of firing people ie...the white house travel staff.
The Dems are stirring the pot again with seeds of hatred and fear.
Soon, they will start on Medicare and social security failing again, which they did nothing about during Bill's rule.
It is getting old.

Answer 3

I'm not a liberal or conservative. I don't think bush is like hitler but I think he is more like our brave men who fought in world war 2. Sometimes you have to do things that the majority of people won't agree with and it takes a good leader to do that.He's not perfect just like the rest of the complainers. When we dropped 2 bombs in japan it was the right thing to do and I see the war in iraq the same way. Should we all just turn a blind eye to the people who were being killed and tortured under sadaam? I'm sure all you guys complaining would welcome a chance to be liberated if sadaam was president of the united states. Do a little reading on the guy before you claim we were wrong to go there. You eknights and princesses digust me with your ignorance. Look at the bigger picture and stop following the media like sheep you sheepeople.

Answer 4

If they study history, then they won't be able to make the correlation between the two. It's something I see liberals do often: ignore facts when they become inconvenient. No, I don't think Bush is the greatest ever, but since 9/11, there's really been nothing but crappy choices available. If they weren't blinded by facts, then they would at least admit that Bush's options were rather limited.

Answer 5

I have read some of the ansewers given! .To compair bush to any thing about wwII is bull! Im not a bush fan myself ASK ALL THE KURDS IN NORTHEN IRAQ HOW SADAM WAS TOO HIS OWN PEOPLE murdered what? a couple hundred thousnd! Plus every thing else! How about kuwat? then these same people sit there and tell the world they have germs,nukes and what ever eles thy could think of, it was time to do something ! its a mess what would al Gore of done or any one else for that matter, LETS START CHOOPING HEADS LIKE THEY DO lets get it done and get out!

Answer 6

Operation Reinhardt, named after it's chief planner Reinhardt Heydrich, second in command of the Shutz Staffel (SS) and chief planner of the extermination of the Gypsy's, Jews and other "undesirables".
This was the plan to murder Polish jews, political opponents , the intellegencia and others in the early stages of the war after Germany had defeated Poland.

Any other questions?

Answer 7

Bill Clinton's greatest failure as president details how his indecisiveness, negligence, poor judgment and denigration of the U.S. military made America an open target for the terrorist attacks of 9/11.

Eight years before 9/11, on Feb. 26, 1993, Osama bin Laden and his al-Qaida terrorist network declared war against the United States with a deadly attack on the World Trade Center. Al-Qaida continued to wage war on the U.S. throughout the Clinton administration, attacking Khobar Towers in 1996, two U.S. embassies in East Africa in 1998, and the U.S.S. Cole in 2000.

How could these attacks happen? How could al-Qaida wage these assaults against the strongest, best-defended nation in the world? "Intelligence Failure" Clinton's most grievous failure as president of the United States. Clinton's poor leadership and denigration of both the U.S. military and intelligence services exposed America to terrorist assault.

"September 11, 2001, may have happened under Bush's watch," "But it will always remain Clinton's legacy."

Answer 8

Where do you get off making a hasty generalization like that? This question is already biased because you are assuming that liberals believe Bush is as bad as Hitler. I a moderate liberal, and while I do not like Bush's policies, I am sure he never massacred millions of Jews!

Answer 9

people!people!people! put the emotions in neutral and let them coast!
no nothing g.w. has done compares to that.he is guilty of strong arming the American people into a war.i am not republican nor am i democrat.what i am is pro-American.
what we need to remember is-who taught these individuals how to wage war?seems to me that our foreign policy of putting this one in control in favor of that one has come back to bite us in the @ss.
September 11 is not clintons fault nor is it g.w.'s.we had no f*****g business over there way back during the problems with shah.in comes the ayatollah khomeini we got problems with iran we take up with iraq saddam decides he wants to relocate in kuwait in we got problems with iraq.we kick @ss leave him in charge and we got more problems with iraq. see a pattern here? there is more to it but this is where i'll stop.

Answer 10

Quote: because civilian courts have already demonstrated that they don't wan't to fight the war on terror.

Yes. Worrying about all those annoying laws and that pain in the assss Constitution.

Chuck it all for SECURITY, dammit.

(sarcasm)