English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I need some "ammo" for a Youtube video that will be truthful so voters might consider not voting for her. So what are some things wrong with her?

2007-07-22 13:34:26 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Elections

For Morchie, I DO know that at first she was for the Iraq war and know she is against it. And there is my first piece of "ammo". I just heard from alot of people that she would make a crappy president so I assume so and just need more "ammo".

2007-07-22 13:40:56 · update #1

17 answers

absolute total and complete failure to take a meaningful stand on anything.

2007-07-22 13:37:42 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 8 2

Dave Grohl Wanna Be!… and many of the answers mention the fact that Hillary Clinton Oked the war in Iraq and has changed her mind for now she is against it.

Take a good look at the general population in the U.S.A.; the majority of the people who was for the war are now against it.

Many of your citizens are returning home in body bags. This always dampens the spirit of any cause right or wrong.

Instead of making a negative video, do some research into her background and highlight her good and bad points. Make your video objective. Let the public make the judgement call.

If you just post negative about anyone, a lot of people will see you as a whiner and take what you say with a grain of salt.

Do not just take opinions as they are often incorrect (as you said "I just heard from alot of people that she would make a crappy president so I ASSUME so and just need more "ammo"."

By the way, here is something for you to ponder.

ASSUME is make an *** out of U and ME.

Do not assume anything because many people say it is so. Get out there and do your own objective research with an open mind. You may be right or you maybe surprised with what you find.

Good Luck

2007-07-30 03:33:29 · answer #2 · answered by Comp-Elect 7 · 0 0

Hillary generated the Lewinsky scandal, so she could direct peoples attention away from her perjury, shredding of docs and abuse of her powers, for 2 years she played with us.(George mag 12/00).
She demands the White House the way she talks, with a bad attitude. Is not by any means qualified, and could not care less about the American people.
Being consistent in her efforts to get elected is the best thing she does(credit where credit is due).
The one-liners she throws out only show how she has no real knowledge or interest, just an ambition (deceiving she can be, as she is smiling). This is only my humble opinion, she has too much negative activity in her past and would be bad news given too much power. I feel that she should not be allowed anywhere near the country's White House.

2007-07-29 03:00:33 · answer #3 · answered by LindaAnn 4 · 2 0

First her healthcare plan was actually by definition fascist, but most called it socialist. Look up the two terms and then you decide.

Second, there is so much out there showing her flip flopping like a dying fish. I saw a video on the International Film Channel that showed her saying one thing to one group and then saying the exact opposite to another, sometimes only days apart.

Third, she avoids all of the issues completely. Read Dick Morris' new book for great details. He also nails her on the flip=flopping and gives great insight into inner sanctum meetings with the Clintons where they decided it didn't matter what they thought, or what was best for the country, they just followed the poll numbers to make decisions.

Fourth, and this is the best. Hillary has a tendency to change hear accent when she speaks in front of different groups. At my Congregational Church here is Detroit she spoke like a black preacher. The same night on TV they showed a clip of her speaking to the UAW with a blue-collar drawl. I've also seen tape of her speaking to Jewish groups, southerners and an Italian group, each with a different accent. If you could blend these clips it would be hillarious.

Roberta

2007-07-22 13:46:47 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 4 2

A president must be prepared to make sacrifices for the good of the country. They must be above reproach and exercise the highest personal and professional ethics, respect the written and moral laws of our country. When crimes against the people are committed they need to be prepared to take proper action. When acts immoral, illegal, and/or unethical occur in our government they need to be ready to take appropriate action. If a person is not ready to accept these in their personal life why should we expect them in public or professional life? Hillary stood by Bill during one of American histories most unethical acts; if she can turn her back on that kind of activity (not only from a governmental and ethical position but from a personal position) she does not deserve to be in the White House. And, in keeping with their pattern, they felt it should not be considered all that bad because other presidents have had extra marital relations (someone else did it so it is okay if I do it) typical - shift the blame, problem or responsibility on to someone else!

2007-07-30 10:08:14 · answer #5 · answered by amnestiswrong 5 · 0 0

She was on the board of walmart...

The clintons are members of the illuminiti and have supported many policies bringing us closer to the NWO.

She voted FOR IRAQ... and has to my knowledge never took responsiblitiy for that action.. She blames bush... but she voted as well...

She has NO experience leading anyone or anything. She cant even keep her husband on a leash.. much less keep control over a entire nation...

2007-07-29 14:45:22 · answer #6 · answered by Kacy H 5 · 1 0

Check out the "Travelgate" episode when the Clintonistas were in power, The mysterious FBI files found in the White House, Vince Foster's "suicide" and how that was handled. I think the latest is a 1.2 million dollar campaign fundraiser that she did not disclose to the feds. This one is unfolding, so it could be interesting to see how it shakes out.

2007-07-22 13:47:38 · answer #7 · answered by nomad74 3 · 2 1

I wish I knew the name of the book written about the Clintons when 'they' were in the White House, but it escapes me. This book told how Hillary used condoms and sex toys to decorate the First Lady's Christmas tree. This tree was viewed by tours of school children, as well as others. Go figure.

2007-07-23 06:18:29 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 3

Her proposals that we become a nation of shared responsibility is a restatement of Karl Marx.

She never did answer honestly how she made $100,000 in a single year on a $5000 investment in Cattle Futures, despite the fact that according to SEC guidelines, that would have been impossible to do legally.

She never did explain why she had FBI files in her possession.

2007-07-22 13:39:36 · answer #9 · answered by open4one 7 · 5 2

WHEN HILLARY AND BILL LEFT THE WHITE HOUSE AND THE BUSHES MOVED IN HILLARY AND BILL TOOK A LOT OF THINGS WITH THEM THAT WAS NOT THEIRS..THEY HAD TO BRING IT BACK.

HILLARY WENT TO EUROPE AND TOOK ABOUT 400 PEOPLE WITH HER ON THE TAXPAYERS MONEY

THERE IS A BOOK OUT NOW BY DICK MORRIS AND ANOTHER ONE OUT ABOUT HER..DICK MORRIS SAID THE LATEST BOOK ABOUT HER IS THE TRUTH...I THINK THE NAME OF IT IS "ALL ABOUT HILLARY"


SHE OKD THE IRAQ WAR THEN CHANGED HER MIND. JUST WATCH HANNITY AND COOMBS ABOUT THAT ONE.

2007-07-22 13:45:43 · answer #10 · answered by mary 6 · 5 2

Married to Bill.

2007-07-29 08:43:13 · answer #11 · answered by republicanbabe23 3 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers