worst ever!!
2007-07-22 11:38:41
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
3⤋
I think people will realize in a couple of years just how much Bush did good things. As for as the economy (guess you do not keep up with wall street, NYSE, it is very good right now. As for as religious beliefs, he has not interferred with anyone's religion. As for as stem cells, it is a known fact that adult stem cells works better than babies does, so why take them from babies, they can not defend themself, adults can. Only reason why there are negatives regarding Bush, it is nearly election ttime, and the other party is doing every thing they can to discredit the guy. I am glad he does not let them bother him and keeps on protecting America. Worst in history was Bill , slick willy and his wife. Right now it is slander and corruption from the other side to try and win, if they do, we are going to be wishing Bush was back, I would bet on it.
2007-07-22 11:50:50
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
If Iraq pans out, he will go down as one of the greatest presidents in the history of the United States. Under his administration, he was our leader during the WORST attack in our nation's history, the economy has been great (much better compared to dip **** clinton), very low unemployment (4.4% compared to 5.5% under pussy clinton), inflation is very low, the military morale is very high, budget increases for the military, he has crippled al-qaeda, and has had a perfect track record at defending the US (no attacks since 9/11).
With that being said, Iraq must be successful, if not, he will go down as an average to slightly above average president.
2007-07-22 11:43:55
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
He will be known as one of the worst presidents in U.S. history. He led the United States into the war in Iraq with bogus reasons, he is against stem cell research, he has mixed religion with the government, he has led the United States into debt (China es financing much of the war with Iraq), he wanted to sell the ports to an Arab country, the disaster in New Orleans and FEMA, Harriot Myers, among many other mistakes he has done, which are too many to list.
2007-07-22 11:49:59
·
answer #4
·
answered by firulais 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
i'm a conservative, and that i comprehend and help the president, yet you're thoroughly incorrect. enable me to knock down your intent: a million - united statesa. isn't one hundred% Christian, so, notwithstanding if he did do this, it does not influence all of united statesa. (perhaps you, yet you at the instant are not united statesa. the two, you're an American). maximum folk won't care, and could be disappointed over this. 2 - No evidence that no longer beginning the wars could have left us as secure, and he outright neglected international relatives. in case you may say international relatives is stupid, seem to the reality he's gorgeous in it with Iran, Syria, Palestine and North Korea now. 3 - we will see if his coverage helped the economic equipment, too early to tell now. It helped the top type maximum, which will help the economic equipment, and additionally center and decrease type however the jury remains out. 4 - Named legislations is very often a sham. NCLB became relatively a great coverage, yet many states snubbed the implementation of it. this is a failed coverage in that regard. Please, do pass on. you placed 'em up and that i will knock them down.
2016-10-22 09:03:27
·
answer #5
·
answered by loy 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
He will be remembered as the only president who couldn't pronounce 3/4 of the words on the pages in the history books that talk about him.
2007-07-22 11:57:00
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Mediocre. He fought the war on terror, which no one else would. He stuck to his guns, in never ending criticism. He refused to fight to win. He refused to fight the PR war and allowed liberals to lie and distort. He is a big government social conservative. He did a great job getting 2 originalist judges on the Supreme Court.
2007-07-22 11:56:50
·
answer #7
·
answered by Chainsaw 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Depends, will take 10 to 15 years or longer to see what the overall effect of his administrations agenda had been. That's a pretty standard amount of time for most presidents and I'm willing to give him as much.
2007-07-22 11:39:11
·
answer #8
·
answered by Army Retired Guy 5
·
2⤊
1⤋
I think he'll be remembered as "Our Fearless Leader" who didn't give a damn about our troops, but just had to try to prove that we are the most powerful country and will mop up everyone else's messes.
we have no right to butt our noses in where they don't belong. and the "so called, Government" wonders why we are sitting ducks for terrorists. we asked for it.
don't get me wrong, I love our country, but I think it's high time the Government took care of us for a change. we have so many people who are in need.
2007-07-22 12:01:25
·
answer #9
·
answered by chercinbob 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
it all depends on the outcome of Afghanistan and Iraq, if they turn out positive then he will become a legandary hero...... if not then he will be determined a failure only by those angry with him.......American memories are too shortlived to worry abut the trivialities of which presidents are good or bad.....for example how many people still remember what a worhtless president Jimmy Carter was.....
2007-07-22 11:41:07
·
answer #10
·
answered by Twinkie Thief 7
·
3⤊
1⤋
I think he'll go down as the most incompetent leader in world history. Leader? Why grace Bush with the privilege of that title. He needs to be locked up along with his cronies until they rot.
2007-07-22 11:41:25
·
answer #11
·
answered by Drowzeee 3
·
2⤊
3⤋