Because the right only cares about the "pre-born". After that you're screwed unless you're fortunate enough to be born to good parents.
2007-07-22 11:31:17
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
3⤋
The prolonged area , which consists of human beings as much as age 25 , and could comprise the babies of mothers and dads who make as much as eighty 3,000dollars in line with three hundred and sixty 5 days in some states ...the comparable reason Democrats stated taxing the wealthy , till they found there became no longer adequate gross sales , so now they're going to attempt a 50 cents gasoline tax , a sparkling carbon tax on each and every thing made utilising capacity , and do away with the loan deduction on earnings taxes ...the carbon tax is meant to be to maintain the enviroment , which to them is so we are able to pay the capacity expenditures of the unfavourable ....Democrats want all the government administration they could recover from human beings , in the event that they tackle paying expenditures for human beings , it supplies anybody no longer something to artwork for , i began off flat broke , now i'm properly off, and that i'm with out coverage on me , yet my young babies have it , and that i pay for it myself ...i became bored with being broke , so I busted my @ss to get the place i'm , I see no longer something incorrect with assisting people who relatively need it , yet maximum unfavourable have little guidance by utilising options made on their very own , and many are lazy , why ought to they get rewarded for no longer something , and that i bust my @ss to grant my young babies a existence , and my reward is paying their expenditures ,. i do no longer think of so ...that prolonged ingredient is a shaggy dog tale , and it consists of extra new taxes , we don't want extra taxes the U. S. earnings tax gross sales is on the utmost greenback quantity ever in historic previous , in the event that they ( Political Leaders ) provide up waisting money assisting the wealthy , we are able to have extra to spend on different issues , if congress supplies 20 million money to help farmers , did you comprehend that money is split up between the massive companies that havae a farming franchise , it does not pass to the kin farmers who want the help ....and specific Congress executed that throughout the time of a pink meat venture ...
2016-10-22 09:02:45
·
answer #2
·
answered by loy 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
1. Where is your link proving that this is indeed true?
2. Why should I pay for your kids' health insurance?
3. I love how the left continues to inflate the numbers related to healthcare and health insurance. It wasn't too long ago that 5MM people didn't have health insurance. Now, it's over 40MM and 7.4MM kids.
4. For several answerers, what does abortion have to do with health insurance?
5. And, finally, your ideas are?
2007-07-22 11:46:36
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Mr. Bush has nothing against children and everything against Socialism. Expanding government funded health insurance is a back door attempt to nationalize health care. Anyone with a brain should be able to understand that.
The federal government should not be in the health insurance business.
2007-07-22 11:30:26
·
answer #4
·
answered by regerugged 7
·
2⤊
2⤋
Why is it George, everytime a socialistic program comes under scrutiny, you're the first to defend it. We are not socialists in the US, we don't follow the edict of something for nothing.
Wipe your tears away and find something more productive to sell, because I'm not buying another freebee program from you or any other bleeding heart, that happens along !
2007-07-22 11:30:45
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
Your link?
2007-07-22 11:30:29
·
answer #6
·
answered by American Man 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
truthisback, has hit it! Quit blaming Bush. How much pork did the Socialists add to that bill? Anyone out there know?
Good grief, people. Do you not expect others to take responsibility for themselves?
2007-07-22 11:42:58
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
Why do you characterize it as having something against someone?
He just doesn't want to force some people to pay other people's bills.
Actually Ervin you're wrong, universal health insurance puts money INTO the HMOs' pockets. There will be more subscribers. Some of us will have to pay for other people's programs but they'll all be paid for. That's why health care execs are FOR universal health care - - - it'd be like the CEO of McDonalds being for a program by which the government would buy everyone a Big Mac.
Hey stupid lazy Libs instead of voting thumbs down why don't you shut your computers off and go out and GET A JOB!
2007-07-22 11:27:42
·
answer #8
·
answered by truthisback 3
·
4⤊
8⤋
We have to pay for all the ILLEGALS anchor babies that get free medical care,and a free education compliments of the US taxpayer...
2007-07-22 11:33:16
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
He's a selfish insane war monger. Keeping kids insured would distract him from wrecking other people's lives.
2007-07-22 11:35:20
·
answer #10
·
answered by Drowzeee 3
·
1⤊
4⤋