Would an impeachment trial cause another 9/11 event so Bush could enact his NSPD 51 & HSPD 20 Directives ?

Question

Coragryph - Your answer is very good.

Raymond - Your answer is also appreciated up to the point of insulting a previous answerer.

This question wasn't asked to point blame on Bush for 9/11 but in NSPD 51 the directive clearly points out that any tragic event or natural disaster can trigger the immediate enactment of it.

Answer 1

Bush doesn't need those directives.

He has close to 25% of the population willing to follow him over that constitutional cliff without anything happening.

And with another attack, half of the rest of the sheep in this country would scream and cry for him to do anything to protect them, no matter what it costs.........

Americans abandoned all respect for the Constitution and the Founder of this nation long ago. We're just coasting downhill until the inevitable collapse at this point.

Answer 2

They wouldn't impeach Shrub because Cheney would be an even worse leader. What people will not likely seem to put together is the fact that Cheney had the nations air defense controls at his fingertips during 9/11 from his Pentagon bunker. The Pentagon has the most sophisticated missile defense system in existence yet alledgedly a plane hit it anyway. Bush only looks and acts like an idiot when he is lying. The events post 9/11 seem to suggest that they were all planned prior to 9/11. And, Clinton and Bush are part of the same plan developed by PNAC. I think Clinton laid much of the groundwork for Bush, then the 2000 election was stolen by Bush. In 2004 it was a guaranteed Skull and Bones member that would be elected. Now in 2008 it seems that we will be back to Clinton for 8 more years. Americans need to wake up and realize that we have already been sold out to special interests and the global corporate machine.

Answer 3

First off, your question implies that the President caused 9/11. If that is your implication, then I'll just catagorize this as another 9/11 wacko theory question. Otherwise, I'll leave you with the question "which party is always trying to disarm the American public?" Seems to me that constitutional suspension is something that has long been the province of the Democrats. Diann Feinstein herself said if she could have gotten the vote, she would have confiscated all firearm in American.

coragryph:

What are all the sheep going to do, rely on you for our protection? That should really make us feel secure. Looking at your photo, I wouldn't rely on you to protect my dog house.

Answer 4

And since he probably won't be impeached, isn't the whole thing sort of a moot point? And even if he gets impeached, he'll never get convicted - it's nearly impossible. Besides, given a choice between Bush and Cheyney, I'd pick Bush any day. He's imcompetent, but I'm pretty sure he's not evil

Answer 5

Many already believe there will b another staged attack anyway. Then most of the ignorant slobs in America who are to stupid and to cowardly to do anything - will beg their God (G.W. Bush) to do something. Another Govt hand out.

Only 2-3 % fought tryanny during the Am Rev. My guess is that only 2-3 % will fight in the next 1. roughtly 2-3 million patroits. Count me in this group.

Answer 6

Forget Dub-ya and concentrate on Chaney. If he were facing impeachment maybe it would seriously slow down all this false flag and Iran war crap. We have HR 333 begging for support in congress and all of us need to get behind it!
Link to congress below, demand they take action on this impeachment bill!

Answer 7

It might, but if he did that it would cause a revolution to start. The majority of the people have had enough of his crap.

Answer 8

no