.. by bringing about better lives and futures for all. If not all people are enjoying/ reaping the fruits of intelligence then why should the definition be universal? And then, if supposed intelligence is creating too many negative side effects in the lives of most people (at least indirectly), then the meaning of the word must be redefined. So, in this day and age, what does one mean when one speaks of intelligence and sets apart oneself as intelligent as opposed to another? And doesn't it take intelligence to survive in any given enviroment?
2007-07-22
10:15:45
·
4 answers
·
asked by
Mrs. Midnightbully
4
in
Society & Culture
➔ Other - Society & Culture
Mike10613, thanks but you still haven't given answers to the question.
2007-07-22
10:33:33 ·
update #1
That was a long article. Thank you for your response. You say "Intelligence is the ability to take the mental powers that you have and make the best of them". I believe when you say "make the best of them" you still mean finding ways of making life easier. When people use intelligence negatively and wage chemical or biological warfare I believe that they are thinking life/it would be better/easier if so and so was removed. Isn't that why the question is often asked whether economic and material "developement" has brought true hapiness or not. It is assumed that since life has been made much easier people will respond to that with greater hapiness. So people want to relieve themselves of hunger, pain, toil and its wear and tear, disease, cold etc. Needs are not the same in every enviroment nor the solutions. What may be perceived as problematic and needing solutions in one enviroment may be looked upon as OK in another. People will use & build on what works for them in an enviroment.
2007-07-23
02:20:55 ·
update #2