English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

In 1948, Palestinian Arabs and four Arab members of the UN went to war - not only against Israel, but against the UN decision for a two-state solution in Palestine.
Arabs of Palestine could have had their coutry 59 year if only accepted the UN decision and avoyed all the killings and terror, so what they want now from the Jews?

2007-07-22 09:17:43 · 4 answers · asked by Atlas 2 in Arts & Humanities Theater & Acting

4 answers

You're on the right track, except there were no Palestinian Arabs fighting.

The term "Palestinian Arabs" was invented only in 1964.

And seven Arab states attacked the new State of Israel in 1948.

Palestinians are the newest of all the peoples on the face of the Earth, and began to exist in a single day by a kind of supernatural phenomenon that is unique in the whole history of mankind, as it is witnessed by Walid Shoebat, a former PLO terrorist that acknowledged the lie he was fighting for and the truth he was fighting against:

“Why is it that on June 4th 1967 I was a Jordanian and overnight I became a Palestinian?”
“We did not particularly mind Jordanian rule. The teaching of the destruction of Israel was a definite part of the curriculum, but we considered ourselves Jordanian until the Jews returned to Jerusalem. Then all of the sudden we were Palestinians - they removed the star from the Jordanian flag and all at once we had a Palestinian flag”.
“When I finally realized the lies and myths I was taught, it is my duty as a righteous person to speak out”.

This declaration by a true "Palestinian" should have some significance for a sincerely neutral observer. Indeed, there is no such a thing like a Palestinian people, or a Palestinian culture, or a Palestinian language, or a Palestinian history. There has never been any Palestinian state, neither any Palestinian archaeological find nor coinage. The present-day "Palestinians" are an Arab people, with Arab culture, Arabic language and Arab history. They have their own Arab states from where they came into the Land of Israel about one century ago to benefit from the Jewish immigration. That is the historical truth. They were Jordanians (another recent British invention, as there has never been any people known as "Jordanians"), and after the Six-Day War in which Israel utterly defeated the coalition of nine Arab states and took legitimate possession of Judea and Samaria, the Arab dwellers in those regions underwent a kind of anthropological miracle and discovered that they were Palestinians - something they did not know the day before.

.

2007-07-22 22:31:53 · answer #1 · answered by Ivri_Anokhi 6 · 1 1

Add to the the avowed intent of the Arabs to destroy Israel and kill it's citzens--and the fact that not one of the Arab states wished to absorb the Palestinians --rather desiring to leave a hotbed of hatred to ferment. Whether one likes it or not, Israel is a soverign nation. Should France be given to the Italians because Rome once held it, heck Rome once held part of England--might as well give that back too. Whether one likes it or doesn't like it--Israel is a soveriegn nation and has been for 60 years. Palestinians and the arab world in general can either deal with another 100 years of conflict or accept this and the world can move on.

2007-07-22 10:04:36 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

your definition of the situation ignores two points:
1- Regardless of membership, the Western powers were running the UN,
2- Palestine was not the UN/West's to divide up and establish a Western colony in.

If I siezed your house and offered a "solution" in which you get to live in the root cellar but my friends get the rest of the house, I doubt you'd accept the deal either.

If the West/UN was serious about creating a safe-haven Jewish state, it should have been established in the West.

2007-07-22 09:27:11 · answer #3 · answered by kent_shakespear 7 · 1 1

You're talking about historical fact.

Facts aren't useful for proving your point here. You need to shout and be irrational and make things up -- if all you do is cite provable facts and make logical intelligent arguments, nobody is going to listen to you.

2007-07-22 09:22:00 · answer #4 · answered by coragryph 7 · 3 0

fedest.com, questions and answers