Who do you HATE more BUSH JR or BILL CLINTON?

Question

www.myspace.com/blackshakspear

Answer 1

I prefer to not hate

Answer 2

it relatively is what politics has come to interior the u . s . a . This did no longer merely start up with Clinton or Bush it fairly is been strengthen for an prolonged time. From the time L.B.J. took workplace in the previous this manner of propose and unfavourable politics has have been given worse with each and each president . Watch what happens while the subsequent president takes workplace Democrat or Republican it's going to be extra of the comparable.

Answer 3

I hate Bush JR as he has totally changed the situation of US. He is literally going aftet the Oil in Gulf countries and he has accomplished one country Iraq in his regime. He has no other reason to tickle Saddam all of a sudden and capture him costing many innocent people lives and soldiers of US, UK and many others. I believe he is most undesired person to be a President of such a great country. Bill Clinton is far far better and should never ever be compared to a person like Bush JR. First of all being a President he doesnt know how to behave in front of media recently he winked at the Brit Queen. That is enough for his standards to be judged as a better person or not.

Answer 4

I really hate Dumbya - he's done more harm to this country than any President before him could ever have dreamed of doing. On the flip side, Clinton did the most good for this country and for the world.

Answer 5

Bush did more for this country in one day then Clinton ever did his whole 8 years if you look at the data CLINTON could have avoided 911 but he was too stupid to do anything about it and well bush is doing the right thing for the war on terrorism we need to stop them there before we have to fight them here and i would much rather fight and win (been to Iraq twice not and we are winning) then have the terrorists come to the states and kill my kids when they are asleep via dirty bomb car bomb or anything like that the terrorists are not on a mission to save their land they are on a mission to exterminate all Christians and the Democracy's of the world i say it like that because Muslims are not all terrorists i have made allot of Muslim friends the few times i was over there and they are great people its the fanatics that you need to look out for and well every religion has them even Christians you know the holier then thou type so ya

Answer 6

BOTH OF THEM !!! Bill Clinton almost as much as Bush. Bush gets a little bit more hate from me because he has spent a whole lot more than Clinton, and killed more people than clinton. That is not to say that Clinton wasn't a TERRIBLE president.

Answer 7

They both represent neo-liberalism the vehicle of neo-conservatism.

Neoliberalism's prerequisites for nations to garner acceptance and receive assistance are a form of international blackmail. Severe penalties exist for non-compliance. A nation may be branded a pariah for choosing something other than the neo-liberal model. Not being on the Unites States' “most favored nation status” is one form of retribution. Being under the imposition of a devastating worldwide economic embargo is another. And, human rights do not matter much. China, a communist nation with its many violations, has been granted most favored nation status. Cuba, also a communist country, with its internationally acknowledged gains in social, medical, and educational services for the people, has not. Cuba's refusal to acquiesce to the dictatorship of free market capital circulation is to – neoliberalism – a much bigger crime, than China's violation of people's human rights. China exports cheap consumer goods to the United States and the world. Cuba exports human capital, its doctors and teachers, and imports tourists. One contributes to the dictatorship of the free market. The other resists. The political system matters little when a nation embraces the neoliberal model. Neither do the conditions under which people live. Globalization, for example, has brought the world both colonialism and contributed heavily to slavery. Profit came at the expense of the indigenous and the slaves.

To the dictatorship of free market capital circulation, only the neoliberal economic system and its survival matters. Totalitarian, democratic, non-democratic, communist and non communist, are welcome into the community of neoliberal nations, as long as the prerequisites for membership are adhered to, that is, that they embrace and participate in free trade without restrictions nor impediments. Neoliberal-accepting nations must place everything up for sale, the material as well as the human (worker) natural resources.

While one dictator, the former CIA asset, Saddam Hussein, was executed after the illegal occupation of Iraq, another dictatorship and oppressive monarchy next door in Saudi Arabia is embraced. Saddam bucked neoliberalism by nationalizing Iraq's oil industry, while the House of Saud embraces and is a major player in it. It is interesting to note, that while Iraq accepted and played along with neoliberalism, Saddam Hussein, was allowed to run his country any way that he wanted. Saddam's torture and gassing mattered not as long Saddam played by neoliberalism's rules.

Answer 8

Hate is a strong word. I dislike Bush, and I don't think Clinton was a bad president. How about instead of asking people, you decide for yourself.

Answer 9

I don't waste my energy with hate, but I think Bush is so much more evil than Clinton. Clinton lied about a bj. BFD. Bush lied to get us into this f-ed up war and over 3600 American soldiers have died. We should never forget the innocent Iraqi civilians (including thousands of children) who have died during this "insurgency". BRING OUR TROOPS HOME.

Answer 10

Clinton may have been dangerous to his marriage but Bush is dangerous to America, the whole structure of our government.....and the constitution.

Answer 11

Clinton was effective, he got things done. Who says you have to like him? Bush is a failure, everything he touches turns rotten.