Harry Reid himself is an idiot. This is one man who would do more harm to America than good. For people to call Bush a horrible President, does not make sense.
Our economy is doing very well right now. Surprisingly so with a war going on. Of course, the same people will not acknowlege this or give Bush credit, but they are quick to bash him for when anything goes wrong. I am in now way saying Bush is the greatest we've ever had, but despite his lack in popularity, which is due mainly to the war, America is strong right now, wether you want to believe it or not. He alone had the balls to take down Saddam, which in fact needed to be done. He alone, is standing up against the Islamic terrorists that want to kill all of us. The war needs to be fought, plain and simple.
Whats funny is, back in the time of Hitler, people back then were against the war. Thought we could "negotiate with him. What if the president listened back then and didnt fight
? What would the world be like now?
2007-07-22
06:58:31
·
16 answers
·
asked by
Bucfan
2
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics
I applaud Bush for the economy and also the war. I hate that people are dying but not fighting our enemies and running away would be a grave mistake. Some times, unpoplular things are actually the right things to do. Fighting these bastards is the best thing for our future.
Even so, say what you want about the war, but to say Bush is not a good president is just wrong. Would you rather have a Hilary running the show. Raising your taxes, ruining the economy, and backing awary from our enemies?
2007-07-22
07:01:13 ·
update #1
Our economy is not doing well, we are in so much debt that we may never dig our way out! The only ones doing well are the rich Republicans who plan to keep it this way. The middle class is slowly disappearing, with no medical insurance, no pensions and nothing but a miniscule tax rebate given as a token. The war is costing billions a month, where do you think that is coming from??? All the programs he was elected on, have totally disappeared. He is an embarrasment when he goes to other countries, his speeches are a study in empty platitudes, he is about as uneducated and intelligent as a fifth grader. He took down Saddam when it was Bin Laden we were after, and now we are so mired down that we may never be able to leave without looking like war criminals to the rest of the world. At least Hitler was the real bad guy, not a demented dictator that by the way we put into power way back when. Bid Laden is still out there and yes he does have plans for us, and where is our Army, in Iraq! The wrong place at the wrong time! Congratulations to our "illustrious leader"!
2007-07-22 07:44:03
·
answer #1
·
answered by Havasoo 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
Bush is the worst president that we have ever had and Reid is just telling the truth. Leading the country into a war in Iraq was a shameful exercise in deception on Bush’s part. I wish Libby could have been pressured to talk so that we could learn the truth about the planned media hit job on Joe Wilson because he dared to publish an account of the alleged Iraqi attempt to purchase yellow cake uranium in Africa.
Bush has exploited 9/11 to carry out the PNAC agenda, abused his power and has made us less safe by aiding al Qaeda recruitment.
BTW the people who opposed FDR’s WWII efforts to help our allies, prior to Pearl Harbor, were Republican isolationists.
I hope the Republicans try to run on great the economy is. They will surely lose. To average Americans this is not a great economy because they are not reaping the benefits.
2007-07-22 07:16:55
·
answer #2
·
answered by relevant inquiry 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Bush is the worst president in my lifetime for sure. It's not because he's a conservative elite, not because he's a republican, not even because he is suffering from "born again-PTSD." He is a bad president because he is a real idiot- in national addresses he comes across as a local store owner in your town doing a local tv commercial. It is obvious that he's reading the words and following the bad advice of some weird doctors of psychology.
Reid is a boring old man who will be forgotten soon enough, don't worry.
But bush will go down in history, and if what they did for Reagan is any clue as to how bush will be remembered he will be deified. As I remember it, Reagan was an evil man who lied to the people in every address. Remember the Iran contra affair or do you not recall?
yeah, a man suffering from altzeimers with his finger on the button- yeah, he was a great man.
The president during WW2 was a democrat. There are no parallels between WW2 and this mess in Iraq and Afghanistan. I can see parallels between it and Vietnam, and the Palestinian/Israel conflict though.
We did try to negotiate with hitler but he still marched into Poland and France. we got into that war because of japan bombing...OK one parallel!
2007-07-22 07:39:58
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Reid has nothing of value to offer, so to get his 2 minutes of fame and publicity, he climbs on the hate train. Bush bashing is not just a favorite pass time, it's a publicity tool.
2007-07-22 07:19:03
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Yes. I would rather have Hillary or any other person in the White House. Bush is the worst ignorant President , broke Constitutions, listen in on our calls , reads our email, say it and he has broke it. He created a war that has killed all our troops, innocent Iraq and now he is stating he'll go into Pakistan if he wants. When he does, we're going really have holy war Syria, Iran , Pakistan, Arabia all the Muslims countries are coming in after us. We need to get that a damn fool out of office yesterday, mark my word he is going to get us all killed, I really and truly hate him and his whole Administration., how you like those cookies you Bush lover. People like you need to go join up are get the hell out of America if you love him so much join him in hell.
2007-07-22 07:13:05
·
answer #5
·
answered by Nicki 6
·
1⤊
2⤋
Give me Reid , Bush is the worst president we have ever had. Getting our future lawyers and doctors and teachers kill in a war we didn't have to fight. History will be his legacy and his family will be the laughing stock of the world. We have people believing money is every thing and people dont matter. Case in point you. We are strong against what! we have lost a lot of freedoms. Try going to the airport and saying boo! You dummies are going to be the downfall of America
2007-07-22 07:10:07
·
answer #6
·
answered by margie s 4
·
1⤊
4⤋
Actually, back then the Republicans were against fighting Hitler, but whatever.
The war didn't actually need to be fought. Sadam posed no threat against us: he was not threatening us. Osama should be dealt with like any other criminal.
Granted, Bush isn't THE worst, but he's up there.
2007-07-22 07:04:24
·
answer #7
·
answered by viciousparrots 2
·
2⤊
2⤋
Reid and Palosi will go down in political history as the fastest disintegration of a political victory in history. From 06 election in November to 14% approval rate.
Maybe less campaigning and pandering to the Far Left power brokers for money to real legislation other than political theater....they can regain the faith they squandered away.
2007-07-22 07:04:59
·
answer #8
·
answered by garyb1616 6
·
2⤊
3⤋
Harry Reid, and his partner Baghdad Nancy Pelosi, are both liberal democrats. This means that their grasp of reality is very tenuous. They live in a world all their own, and when reality does impinge on their fantasies, they become upset and disoriented. To them, Bush is horrible not because of what he has or has not done, but simply because he lives in reality and they don't. If liberal democrats had been in power during WW2, we would now be speaking German and goose stepping. Reid and Pelosi are both not only traitors to the US, but also very dangerously out of touch with reality
2007-07-22 07:05:34
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
3⤋
Because Bush has done more harm to the constitutional balance of govt than any other president in history.
Ignore his party, ignore his other decisions, ignore everything else --- just looking at his assertion that the executive office can break any law it wants at will, and the the executive branch is not answerable to the courts or congress.
If a Democrat had said the same things, would you be defending that president? Or is your support only partisan?
2007-07-22 07:02:49
·
answer #10
·
answered by coragryph 7
·
5⤊
5⤋