English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

In 2003, former North Carolina Senator and current presidential candidate, John Edwards said on MSNBC in 2003:
"Serving on the Intelligence Committee and seeing day after day and week after week the briefings on Saddam's weapons of mass destruction and his plans on using those weapons; he can not be allowed to have those weapons. It‘s just that simple!"

2007-07-22 05:02:17 · 5 answers · asked by Uncle Pennybags 7 in Politics & Government Politics

5 answers

there are simply hundreds of examples just like this. it's shocking how Libs and Dems turn a blind eye and a deaf ear to this.

2007-07-22 05:10:41 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Edwards is a liar too.

Common sense told me Saddam had no WMDs. He used everything he had (i.e. everything we gave him) in the 10-year war with Iran. If he'd had anything left, he would have used it against us in the Gulf War. He was broke from fighting Iran, then he got broker from 10-years of embargo.

Ron Paul, Russ Feingold, Barak Obama, and Al Gore weren't fooled and neither was I.

Edwards, Clinton, Giuliani, Romney, McCain, Biden, and Thompson are all fools or scoundrels or both.

2007-07-23 13:16:16 · answer #2 · answered by Ray Eston Smith Jr 6 · 2 0

True. If Bush "lied" then so did Edwards.

2007-07-22 12:04:56 · answer #3 · answered by Brian 7 · 3 1

Because Democrats are honest. I have no source to give credit to this statement but I don't need one. That's how I roll. I decide what is right or wrong and if it don't agree with me, it's wrong.

2007-07-22 12:05:05 · answer #4 · answered by eldude 5 · 1 3

Because they are not opposed to ignoring facts when it doesnt fit their story-

2007-07-22 12:10:37 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

fedest.com, questions and answers