to run against Bush in 2004?
2007-07-22 04:53:51 · 12 answers · asked by TJ815 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Diana: When people make fun of Bush everyday for being the worse president in history... Kerry is still relevant in noting that there was no 'great choice'.
2007-07-22 04:59:58 · update #1
4 years of searching for a better candidate than Kerry and they offer the experience of Obama and the shrillness of Hillary.
Way to go good job Democrats. what can you say about a party that would allow Howard Dean to represent them?....
2007-07-22 04:59:29 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
It's not that they couldn't find anyone better.
It's that the Democrats made a stupid choice. If they had nominated someone with a pulse, who was capable of speaking in other than monotone, they probably would have won.
Look at it this way. Kerry got roughly 50% of the vote DESPITE how lame a candidate he was. If someone could have really motivated the Democrats and independents, the election would have turned out differently.
2007-07-22 11:58:15 · answer #2 · answered by coragryph 7 · 4⤊ 0⤋
It must because it should have been a landslide Democrat victory but they managed to find a candidate that couldn't beat Bush.
2007-07-22 12:01:12 · answer #3 · answered by Brian 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
It should have been a slam dunk, in the end whether it be a Democrat or a Republican corporate America gets exactly who they want.
2007-07-22 11:57:28 · answer #4 · answered by somber 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Strange thing is: the Dems cannot find anyone, now, who is better than Kerry. The left wing liberal loonies are all the same.
2007-07-22 11:57:03 · answer #5 · answered by regerugged 7 · 3⤊ 3⤋
The dems went down the shi**er after JFK.
2007-07-22 11:59:46 · answer #6 · answered by Tin Foil Fez 5 · 3⤊ 1⤋
There was nothing wrong with Kerry. The nation was split down the middle. It all came down to a few absentee voters in Ohio.
2007-07-22 11:56:20 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 4⤋
It should bug them even more right now that they can't find anyone better than Hillary, Edwards or Obama Huessin!!
2007-07-22 12:01:25 · answer #8 · answered by BAARAAACK 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
To the Dems he's a vet and a hero... to soldiers and the american people he is a coward and the knife driven in the into back of every american
2007-07-22 11:58:52 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
No,Kerry is old news. Got anything new and relevant?
2007-07-22 11:56:42 · answer #10 · answered by Slimsmom 6 · 3⤊ 4⤋