2007-07-21 19:50:21 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
working.....
2007-07-21 20:05:38 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 4⤋
Undeniably, the government Bush has helped most terrorists to become active. U.S.A. does not have any reliable ally apart from Great Britain. The political line of America to attack Iraq without any powerful reason made the country of the Middle East a territory of reproduction of heretical violence between Sunni and Shiite and a lot of innocent Iraqis were killed. In a research that was realised recently in various nations, G. W. Bush was elected as one of the worse chairman in the history of United States of America and as number 1 perpetrator of violence and enemy of citizens. And this, not unfairly. He is a chairman that is sentimentally committed in a failed policy that does not function and has lost all the public support. There is not any exterior policy, apart from an adaptation of the Third Reich and a sick tactic of expansive wars. Generally, United States have never been hated so much and
from so many nations. This Chairman “outlay” the country in bankruptcy and will take a lot of generations in order to pay this deficit, if it can be paid by far all.
2007-07-22 03:08:23 · answer #2 · answered by kittana! 2 · 4⤊ 1⤋
There's so much hypocrisy in it, the rest of the world must shake their heads in dismay. I hope they see low approval ratings as an indication that most of us are doing the same!
-- International Court of Justice (aka, World Court) - US was instrumental in establishing it, then Bush took us out a few months before invading Iraq.
-- Geneva Convention: ratify means ignore if inconvenient?
-- UN: US immunity to war crimes wasn't renewed, so will we quit UN too?
-- Iraq: No real terrorist threat... until we occupied
-- Pakistan: al Qaeda's there, we play 'footsie' with them. Bush promised $750 million to win 'hearts and minds' in al Qaeda-occupied tribal regions. No chance that money could fall into the wrong hands and fund attacks against us.
-- Venezuela & Cuba: offered aid to us after Katrina, but Bush refused because we aren't used to doing that. But now he knows how to give them money to win their 'hearts and minds' too. Huh?
If there's a method to this madness, I'd like to know what it is. All I see is the madness!
2007-07-22 05:23:26 · answer #3 · answered by sagacious_ness 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
George Bush ran initially as being anti-war and for small government.
He has set up an impossible mission! W. cannot expect the U.S. to police the world. And we can't even maintain our OWN borders.
Not only are we at war, we now have this HUGE agency called Homeland Security and the war is costing more than we can afford.
I for one, don't want to be indebted to China for loaning us the money to fight it! And we are indebted to the tune of 9 Billion Dollars!
2007-07-22 03:27:31 · answer #4 · answered by toota956 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
What foreign policy?
Well, I guess if you mean the policy is foreign to any thinking, intelligent, aware human being, you have a point.
2007-07-22 03:20:19 · answer #5 · answered by Joey's Back 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
It's why we're hated all over the world.
We need to attend to the US for a change. It's better for us and better for the rest of the world. Only a few wealthy corporations will suffer if we take care of our own for a change and leave those poor people alone so they don't have to strap explosives to themselves to be heard.
We can do a lot with those billions we throw away where we're not wanted.
2007-07-22 03:11:39 · answer #6 · answered by TJTB 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
I just say one word: "terrible"
2007-07-22 03:24:46 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋