mostly for people that pop babies out and have them end up in child protective services
2007-07-21 19:14:21 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
That is a fine line to walk because who determines the level of abuse and to what degree that is punished. The problem lies in the society that creates these "types" of parents. "An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure" makes more sense now than ever. We as "good" parents must start with educating our own before they become these "types" of parents.
2007-07-21 19:27:10 · answer #1 · answered by ihadnuttin2dowitit 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Sound good to me, but I have also support mandatory sterilization of parents that have been on welfare for three continuous years, sexual offenders, addicts, and alcoholics, and gang members. Sounds good, but will never happen, we are told we must be more tolerate of these people, it is not their fault, it would be in humane, and etc.
2007-07-22 04:03:12 · answer #2 · answered by oldcorps1947 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
How about for the ones that leave their babies in dumpsters? That just is the most disgusting thing that someone could do to a baby. All they have to do is take it to a hospital, or firestation and tell them that they can't care for them.
2007-07-22 02:25:24 · answer #3 · answered by Ryan's mom 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
I would also include criminals, adicts, morons, idiots and jerks (we got too much of those genes walking around).
2007-07-22 03:24:24 · answer #4 · answered by ? 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes but ACLU prevents any such action! Are they not the ANti Christ? Pigs!
2007-07-22 02:23:57 · answer #5 · answered by brenda r 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
not a terrible idea as long as that would include mom AND dad!
2007-07-22 02:20:02 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 0⤋
Them and you.
2007-07-22 02:17:56 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 6⤋