English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

3 answers

If its being used to stop a 3rd World Country from developing when they have next to no development, then sure. However for the most part its used in an attempt to keep the natural environment from disappearing, or to try and prevent an economy from collapsing.

The environment part should be obvious, if the entire earth gets covered in skyscrapers and there's no grass anywhere, then where will all the cows go to make the steaks I love so much? Etc.

The economy part is a little harder, but imagine you're a government official, and want to promote economic growth in your country. You can do so easily by helping companies build their buildings, etc. But if you don't make sure those companies are actually bringing money/jobs into your country, then you're going to run out of money and not be able to "sustain" that economic development.

If I'm not mistaken, a lot of people have been concerned as to whether or not China's recent economic boom (Beijing has something like a 10% economic growth rate over the last 5 years) is sustainable or whether or not an inevitable bust is on the way.

If it isn't than it could be trouble for the people in China. If it is, than you can bet that the people currently in First Place (the US) will do everything in their power to compete (even if it means calling upon arguments under the guise of being humanitarian). Its hard to seperate the sheep and the wolves sometimes.

If China's economic development is sustainable, I personally don't support trying to tell them that it isn't (outright lying), but if it is the US population needs to get its act together and start embracing hard work to compete.

2007-07-21 18:17:47 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

i think of you are able to relax so deeply and settle for issues to such an quantity which you're feeling love in each and everything. you will nevertheless react to oppose issues which look out of team spirit with the circumstances, yet there is what i assume is 'unconditional love' for lifestyles itself which fits previous all circumstances and kinds. i think of letting pass of the suggestions which make us annoying and consciously relaxing into each and every 2d can take you to a love it incredibly is unconquerable. on an identical time as i think of this gives you with great 'capacity' in the international, this love conquers the phobia interior, extremely than hindrances outdoors, that would desire to nevertheless persist.

2016-10-22 08:05:45 · answer #2 · answered by jacobson 4 · 0 0

Poor countries must develop their own resources and must not rely on rich countries for aid because the latter will demand to exploit them.

2007-07-21 18:10:55 · answer #3 · answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers