YOU 100% RIGHT
2007-07-21 17:26:52
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Nope. The movie is scheduled to release this way:
2 movie in three year:
one in Summer holiday(June/July)
other in Thanksgiving/before Christmas(Nov/Dec).
The book depends on when J K Rowling finishes writing. She finished deathly Hallows in April.
So production time n other things makes the book n movie released together.
If the case was she has finished writing but they r waiting for the movie then u can say that.
And the previous books were released in different time previosly than movies.
And to other users: If u haven't read the book don't say the movie sucks cos u will hardly understand a lot of things from the movie.
2007-07-22 00:53:12
·
answer #2
·
answered by jubair07 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
The new movie was about an older book. It is not based on the newest book.
Having both release dates close is a way to build up excitement for movie and book.
2007-07-22 00:27:07
·
answer #3
·
answered by Rich Z 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Obviously they did it on purpose because the movie brought attention to the series just in time for the book to come out, but I wish they wouldn't have because the movie sucked and the book sucked so I was hit by a double shot of suck this week.
Hello, run-on sentence.
2007-07-22 00:23:08
·
answer #4
·
answered by irefusetodisco 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
well actually, i disagree with that. i think they were not that loyal to the book, i mean they did not show that much detail in the movie. like the quidditch, ron and hermione being prefects etc. they missed out a lot of information, although some of the dialogues were the same in the book but still, i think the movie was disappointing.
2007-07-22 00:28:23
·
answer #5
·
answered by Q&A07 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
No i dont think so. The movie is only the 5th book, and the new book is the very last one. so if ur up-to-date then it shouldnt matter! But hey uno i rekon that last book was a ripper! finished it this morning! i loved it!
2007-07-22 00:23:09
·
answer #6
·
answered by nnatindahat 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Nope movie pulled in more anticipation for the book=$$$
2007-07-22 00:21:59
·
answer #7
·
answered by Landra 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
That was an intentional marketing scheme.
2007-07-22 00:21:46
·
answer #8
·
answered by The Answerer 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think that was on purpose
2007-07-22 00:21:31
·
answer #9
·
answered by shrnstum 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Or vice versa....
2007-07-22 00:26:43
·
answer #10
·
answered by simplesimon 5
·
0⤊
0⤋