Do you think intensive probation is more effective than placing an offender in prison? Why or why not?

Answer 1

Certain crimes are subject to community outrage. There is nothing rehabilitative about these crimes. The result is that punishment is called for. Most violent crimes fall under this category. The so-called victimless crimes usually do not fall into this category. Only repeat offenses of victimless crimes land a person into jail for any length of time. I believe the jingo of the old TV show applies "If you don't have the time, don't do the crime. Don't do it."

Answer 2

Regarding felons:

It depends on the offense and number of previous offenses. I think violent offenders and those with multiple violent misdemeanors should go to prison. Non violent offenders, particular those with few or no priors should be under probation (community supervision). Domestic violence and sexual offenders should be locked up for most of their sentences, but also have an opportunity for probation, if certain conditions are met.

.

Answer 3

intensive probation is a joke. whats there to stop them from offending again. nothing. i know done both. in prison you have less freedom or privileges . probation is easy time. a slap on the wrist

Answer 4

Your question is too broad for a single answer. What type of crime was committed? What exactly IS intensive probation? Without answers to these questions, my best answer is, Sometimes. "Why, or why?" not can't be addressed without a more specific question.

Answer 5

Depends on the crime.

Murder, rape - No.

Drug use - absolutely

There is better drug abuse treatment programs on the outside, plus the motivation of not going to jail is very effective for some people. Not everybody, but many.