2007-07-21 13:19:23 · 4 answers · asked by You Are Enlightened 3 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
No. Not being attached to non-attachment is more along the lines of being attached to attachment. True non-attachment is actually being non-attached to non-attachment so's there's no attachment.
2007-07-21 13:25:09 · answer #1 · answered by Jack P 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You really out to read the works of Buddha who first described Nirvanna. Just for the information, Buddha did not make the final leap to Nirvanna although he was close. He wanted to remain mortal so he could direct others in the path to Nirvanna.
He described Nirvanna a the state of everlasting nothingness from which there is no escape
2007-07-21 16:18:02 · answer #2 · answered by scotishbob 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, but then renders "non attachment" moot. â¼
2007-07-21 15:36:06 · answer #3 · answered by Faedra 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Ultimately if you are aware that you have a choice, then you have it.
2007-07-21 13:30:07 · answer #4 · answered by the Boss 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋