LMAO! You'd be acquitted no matter what! I think most of us will agree...we take care of our own around here.... ;)
2007-07-21 13:22:12
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
"So let me get this straight: science is not determined in a court of law, UNLESS of course, it's Kitzmiller vs. Dover, then it's perfectly fine for the court to decide what's scientific and what isn't? Can you say "double standard"?" Actually, Kitzmiller vs Dover was about whether intelligent design had any sort of scientific backing or if it was just rebranded creationism, and whether it was legal to teach it in schools. There's no double standard here as it was purely a legal matter that was dealt with - is teaching intelligent design in public schools legal. The fact that it exposed intelligent design as simple rebranding of creationism is just an added bonus.
2016-05-19 22:23:47
·
answer #2
·
answered by antionette 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think the jury pool might be tainted. I'm not sure that I would want a jury of P&S's judging me!
2007-07-22 08:44:28
·
answer #3
·
answered by Carl 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes. And I the Jury find you not guilty. (I don't know you well enough to say for reasons of mental defect.) lol
2007-07-21 13:26:00
·
answer #4
·
answered by Amanda K 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
That's a typo. It should read: a jury of your pee'ers.
2007-07-21 13:22:59
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
You will be found guilty Seeker of having gigantic eyes (unlike me).
2007-07-21 13:23:18
·
answer #6
·
answered by KatGuy 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
We the jury find the defendant,,,,,,,,,,Not Guilty
2007-07-21 13:23:04
·
answer #7
·
answered by ////////// 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
And cock-eyed guys in bowler derby hats.
2007-07-21 16:10:51
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I believe so..."Your Honor, I implore you...is this the face of a guilty man?"
2007-07-21 13:23:55
·
answer #9
·
answered by Tut Uncommon 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Better hope not, most of them enjoy voting guilty.
2007-07-21 13:22:12
·
answer #10
·
answered by Booster Gold 5
·
0⤊
0⤋