He's hoping the Sunnis will use those weapons against the Shiia.
If you ask me, I think it's a stupid idea. Because they're only going to use those weapons against American troops. (Both terrorists groups)
2007-07-21 13:17:10
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
The Shia are, in many circumstances, religiously extra conservative and adversarial to outdoors impression than the Sunni. in case you look on the composition of maximum persons of reasonable Arab governments, those with which the U.S. has the closest diplomatic ties they are Sunni. extra effective, the Shia leaders in Iraq have refused to fulfill with U.S. envoys to the area. Their opposition to the U.S. is social gathering philosophical and partly political. Iran, a Shia u . s ., is precisely committed to a Shia ruled Iraq which might strengthen into an extensive best chum of the government in Iran. we have not had diplomatic ties with Iran because of the fact the 1970's. additionally evaluate what permitting the Shia to attack the Sunni's might do interior the long-term. Saudi Arabia has already introduced that they are going to back Iraqs Sunni inhabitants if the U.S. pulls out previously the rustic is physically powerful. Such an overt act via the Saudis might go away Iran open to conflict with Saudi Arabia to guard the Shia inhabitants in Iraq. countries might choose for factors in line with non secular philosophy and a interior of reach non secular conflict might errupt in a interior of reach mandatory to international ability markets. The international economic equipment ought to grind to a halt if this variety of factor have been allowed to ensue. The Shia are no longer vulnerable to be a chum or best chum to the U.S. any time quickly, no count number while we pull out or what we enable them to do. If we abandon the Sunnis, friendly governments via the area will quit to be somewhat so friendly. The worst section is that to make certain the conflict the presense of U.S. troops may be needed back yet while that factor comes the two factors could choose to attack us (besides as one yet another) somewhat than tolerate us.
2016-10-09 05:25:02
·
answer #2
·
answered by limson 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
When questioning things like this it isn't difficult to ascertain an answer. Ask this - what is the likely net result of such action? To futher foment conflict between two sides. EXACTLY! It's as if, mysteriously, they don't want the war to END.... It's needed to continue justifying our existence there (which if it's in danger of dying down too much to quickly, it will be re-fomented) we need to build permanent air bases right there. IT's a very strategic location, after all. The conflict provides us cover to do our real work. We must only make marginally successful attempts to bring 'stability'. We have creative ways of making sure conflict stays going. That is real agenda. Just watch everything from that lens and it will all start to make sense..
2007-07-21 13:21:27
·
answer #3
·
answered by jaymccormick2006 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
Because he wants to manipulate the result so that it fits his agenda better. And because he is so stupid that he can't see the similarity between doing business with the Sunni and what happened with the Taliban in Afghanistan!
2007-07-21 13:24:32
·
answer #4
·
answered by mad_mick001 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
he heard the sunnis were running out of ammo and thought if he could just arm them sunnis they would be able to kill more shittes then shiites would retaliate by killng more sunnis so on and so forth. (more fuel to the fire)
2007-07-21 13:19:21
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think Bush is smarter than people give him credit for.
He is allowing the muslims to kill each other. Everyday there is less of them. If we do have to fight them there won't be many left. Just give them lots of guns and ammo and turn them lose.
2007-07-21 13:21:17
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
It is not rocket science. I am sure you can figure this one out by yourself. Is this breaking news in your neck of the woods?
2007-07-21 13:18:45
·
answer #7
·
answered by vegaswoman 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
what fact do u have of that? where do people come up with this stuff? you just make crap up for the heck of it?
what a joke u are
2007-07-21 13:17:48
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
Hi Chi Guy.
Please post the source (not an opinion piece, please). I know you have one. You're pretty careful.
2007-07-21 13:32:14
·
answer #9
·
answered by mckenziecalhoun 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
So they can all fight together and win this thing!!
"W" Still stands for what? WIN!! WHOOPEE!!
2007-07-21 13:19:15
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋