Marshawn Lynch.
QBs and WRs historically have a hard time adjusting to the NFL (75% of OROYs in the past 20 years have been RBs).
AD is splitting time with Chester Taylor. Lynch is pretty much enthroned as the starter.
RB talent+opprotunity often equals ROY.
2007-07-21 12:48:53
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
None of those. It will be somebody you didn't expect coming out of nowhere to carry their team. I honestly think this year its going to be Marshawn Lynch in buffalo. I believe since he is the single back there he is gonna carry his team far. Peterson is the better running back, but with Chester Taylor there also, he will see less playing time. Also a wideout shouldn't win rookie even though he is the best player in the draft. I just don't see Johnson putting up enough big numbers this year win that title. Russell is on a really really bad team, and same with Quinn. They aren't going to do much this year, and they might not even start. I see it being Lynch, my opinion
2007-07-21 12:51:04
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Adrian Peterson or Russell will be front runners. Peterson will have to be in a 2 back system with Taylor but will still be AD every game. Russell has best chance since he going to play every down. He is going to be Raider's franchise player soon.
2007-07-21 15:34:42
·
answer #3
·
answered by Topher 5
·
0⤊
2⤋
I think Calvin has a better chance than people are giving him credit for. Afterall, now D's are going to have to choose who to double cover, and given that CJ's a rookie I think most teams will pick on Roy Williams instead. Given the numbers Detroit's receivers and QB put up last year (and doin it with Kitna on his back most of the time) and assuming that the Lions' O-line should be at least somewhat improved this season I certainly wouldn't count CJ out of it.
2007-07-21 13:45:44
·
answer #4
·
answered by bobmatzke 1
·
0⤊
1⤋
Definitely not Calvin Johnson. One hard look at that OL and QB and you'll say the same. Personally, I think it'll be Brandon Jackson, with Lynch and Anthony Gonzales at a close 2nd and 3rd. I think that GB has poorer receivers than Buffalo, causing Jackson to get more touches than Lynch.
2007-07-21 13:00:41
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
As much as I want to give it to a QB or a newb WR, it has to go to Lynch hands down! He's a starting RB on the Bills and he will no doubt rush over 1000 yards. Losman is growing but the Bills have a run first offense which will help Lynch's campaign
2007-07-21 12:48:43
·
answer #6
·
answered by heroic_vagabond 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
im surprised some people said marshawn lynch. i didnt think anyone would pick him, but he is my pick. i live in the bay area and i have seen many of lynchs games at cal. he is something special, adrian peterson is probably the better back but he has to split time with chester taylor and CJ is playing in detroit...enough said. russell will probably be bad if he starts since oaklands oline sucks and they loss randy moss.
2007-07-21 13:18:28
·
answer #7
·
answered by what? 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Vince youthful. He became the main suitable. introduced a team back from 0.5 to eight-8. A team that has gained 9 video games in 2 seasons. it particularly is a prevalent step. Who else ought to evaluate to him. Reggie Bush? Reggie became good, yet something of the team carried him to the playoffs. Reggie did no longer deserve the award. Vince became spectacular interior the main of his video games, collectively as Reggie became purely good in one million or 2 video games. Vince youthful deserved the award extra then any of the others.
2016-10-09 05:24:06
·
answer #8
·
answered by limson 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Jamarcus Russell (most rookie quarterbacks)because they have a better chance in throwing the ball...i dont think the RB will do it cuz they work harder during games and look at reggie he was awesome last season he's going to be a STAR this year he gonna set records.But i will go wit JR
2007-07-21 13:15:22
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
Marshawn Lynch. 1,500 yards at least. It may seem unbelievable for a rookie but just wait and see.
2007-07-21 14:31:13
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋