Agree/Disagree?: "All workers should have the right to bargain together for better wages or conditions"

Question

Should this be a fundamental right of workers, both here and abroad, or not?

"Push" - I am a former business owner. Does this now give me the 'right' to talk about workers bargaining in your mind?

Answer 1

I can agree to that, but the other side of the coin is "all workers have the right to do a job for the least amount of pay as possible to secure the job". Who would take a pay cut?
that's why people have their jobs eliminated, they make too much, and someone else is willing to do the job for less money.

Answer 2

Disagree. While it sounds good in theory, in actual practice it has done little more than lower production standards while raising the cost of production considerably. As an adverse reaction, it has also had a direct effect on the false belief of entitlement.
The tactic has raised dramatically both the standard and cost of living. Prior to the late 1960s, Grummen Aircraft Corp. was NOT unionized. That company had a great reputation for taking care of its employees and as such, out produced all others in WW II, Korea and part of Vietnam. Since the unionization of that company, look what has happened. Massive lay-offs, buy-outs and an almost total lack of concern for its employees. And in return, there is ABSOLUTELY no concern for management by the employees. A company at war with itself will never do well.
How would all of the working class people feel if the business owners banned together against them? How would it be beneficial to anyone if those owners adopted the same "Alls fair in love and war" mentality as have the union laborers?
People WANT and EXPECT everything under the sun: better wages, better benefits packages ect.. But from where do they suppose the money to pay for all of that will come? The true answer is, from an increase in the cost of their products and services. Sort of negates the gains they'd hoped to get.

Answer 3

Collective bargaining has created the loss of life of the yank economic equipment. maximum individuals have come to understand this and unions have fallen to their lowest point ever. steel and textiles thoroughly left the country using fact of unions, autos made in usa could not compete with imports, Our instructors are the worst in the international and usa ranks between the worst knowledgeable while placed next to different industrialized international places. the U. S. government have been financing the airways industry to maintain it afloat using unions. the priority with any unionized federal, state or community government workers is they're paid by taxpayers funds. So theoretically the unions would desire to be bargaining with the taxpayer for wages and reward. i ask your self what the prevalent non-government worker could say some tax advance to grant a central authority worker a pay advance in those tough cases. No instead they good purchase with our elected officers who would desire to choose directly to advance taxes and take the warmth from the taxpayer. I have no appreciate for Jimmy Carter or his administration using Iran fiasco. He replace into the worst President ever elected in the U. S.; up in the past.

Answer 4

Your question: "Agree/Disagree?: "All workers should have the right to bargain together for better wages or conditions"

AGREE -- too bad it isn't this simple.

My Question: "Agree/Disagree?: Should workers be denied employment opportunities for refusing to join an ethically questionable organization that takes a cut of his paycheck for itself and regularly gives large donations from employee dues to leftist political candidates?"

DISAGREE -- this is the way it is, unfortunately.

Answer 5

You want a yes or no answer but this issue is bigger than that. Workers should have the right to "bargain together" if they choose but they should also have the right not to. Unions do not want workers to be able to vote against unionization and that is WRONG. Workers should be entitled to a secret ballot vote to determine if this is the will of the majority of the workers within a company. If they vote no then the union people should leave them alone rather than trying to force them into it.

Answer 6

It is a right, but it is also the right of the empolyer to let them all go. There are power in numbers, but they do not have to keep any of you. The viability of either scenario would of course depend on the type and size of company.

There are unions who do exactly this, but most do not have any teeth anymore because of "right to work" laws in many states.

ADDED: A downside of collectively bargaining for wages, is that if you are a superior employee, and the company would pay you more for your performance than for the person who barely keeps their job, and SHOULD receive lower compensation, but you earn the same wages because you have bargained for that position to pay that wage.

Answer 7

No. When a strike endangers the public safety, as in the case of health care or law enforcement services, then the workers have no right to strike.

Answer 8

I don't think they should. The reason why is because my fellow workers do not pay me. Once they start paying me directly then I can see your point. Until then they are not paying me and I am not going to bargain with them seeing I don't pay them either. In fact, I believe that it we did bargain with each other it would have some undesirable flash backs like creating a hostile work environment.

Answer 9

no - it should not depend on whether one is working or not

this is a basic tenet of human compassion and Christian doctrine - not a "right of workers" - it doesn't matter if someone is working or not - they should still be granted the right to "life, liberty" and their "pursuit of happiness" as an individual

if that pursuit leads one to the workplace they do not check their constitutional rights at the door

Answer 10

Disagree. If you don't like the job, the conditions, the pay, then pack your things and get a different job. That is the problem in the US, that is why the other countries are smoking us on wages, we want more than we are worth and we want it in an air conditioned setting, with a fancy break room, and if we should get a scratch, we need three days off and a Workman's comp claim.