China gets blamed for being the greatest poluter but they have twice the population of Europe and 4 times that of America. the real issue is how much polution per person, That is like blaming small countries for controlling the UN when that could be changed to votes per population of the country. But they dont want that because it would mean asia controlling the un ,when it is far easier to bribe small countries with a few crumbs
2007-07-21 11:13:10 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
That is a good question.
It's not just Bush, it's the attitude of most Americans. They really don't think they answer to anyone. They rush shot over the rest of the world as they are an arragant and aggressive nation.
And as Bush is an Evangelist, he'll never do anything to save this planet. They believe they are passing through this planet onto the next world (heaven) so it doesn't matter what state they leave it in.
Also, Bush comes form an oil family. He'll never be green as it oges against his family business. Good ridence to bad rubbish when he goes.
2007-07-21 11:31:04 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Bush has his plate full with the war and the US economy.
For my money he's doing a damn fine job!
Our stock market is at an all time high. Private ownership of homes is at an all time high.
Unemployment is at record lows. And still we are fighting a war costing 10 Billion dollars a month....not bad in my book.
I don't think a few co2 molecules are his biggest concern.
By the way the parts per million of co2 over the last 1000 years has been 20,000 after all of man kinds activity since the industrial revolution they are now 20,023. At that rate we will destroy the atmosphere in about ...Hmmmm, the year 8850, but that is if we maintain the same output as today,,,oh yeah, but we will run out of fossil fuel by 2180. So what is all the stupid , green hype about????
.
2007-07-21 12:45:03 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
The worlds leading authorities agree that human contribution to climate change and other enviromental evolution is insignificant.
The British may be fool enough to allow new labour to manipulate the hype for their own agenda.Fortunately for Americans ,Bush gives his public a little more respect and a lot more freedom.
We all should apply common sense as concerns our world,as we always have.But most of the hype is a cashcow for the treasury.
2007-07-21 11:22:19 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
That is a bit ironic..George Bush's home in Crawford Texas is much more environmentally friendlier than Al Gore's home.
And not just by a little either ... maybe you should look that up before you spout off like Michael Moore.
2007-07-21 11:31:05 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Lets see if I understand.... It's OK to destroy the planet if you are a 3rd world country with lots of people.... or just a poor nation... It's OK to "pollute" if you aren't the US? I suppose that poor CO2 doesn't contribute to the "Climate Crisis"?
2007-07-21 11:43:06 · answer #5 · answered by lordkelvin 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You can't turn a bull into a bullfighter. -RKO- 07/21/07
2007-07-21 12:26:19 · answer #6 · answered by -RKO- 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
How about screaming about Kuwait, as i understand it, they have the biggest carbon footprint of all by capita.
2007-07-21 11:17:31 · answer #7 · answered by A True Gentleman 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Rather irrelevant, but can he spell the word?
2007-07-25 04:08:15 · answer #8 · answered by LEONARD W 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i would like to hear bush say the word , i do'nt think he could
2007-07-21 11:17:03 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Bush is an idiot!! Enough said!!
2007-07-21 11:23:13 · answer #10 · answered by Polar Molar 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋