Shouldn't the whole world be open and accessible to everyone?

Question

No one is born "illegal". Surely it is the right of man to travel the world and all that's in it. Borders, passports and immigration laws are all man-made. How dare a government class a person as illegal. It's a strategy by rich countries to keep the poor down and confined.

Answer 1

Shane, you are correct in what you say and i agree with you in principle but, if you had a big garden and got it just the way you like it, then the whole street where you live decided it was also a nice place and decided to move into it you would be pretty upset wouldn't you? Its to late in human history to goto a utopian way of wondering the planet, we did once as hunter gatherers but these days immigration controls are needed if we are to maintain our wealth and cultural differences, I believe that multiculturalism actually destroys the very think it celebrates, our differences, as cultures clash then eventually absorb each other they may be changed for ever. I believe western goverments are commiting the greatest damage to cultural diversity by keeping the third world in debt but at the same time allowing immigration for cheap labour. I dont know about you but I would hate to goto India and see a McDonalds and Starbucks, in a few hundred years i think most capital cities will look the same.

Answer 2

NO!!!

We work hard within our society to achieve what we have. If the people in other countries want we have then they should rise up and change their own systems of government. Instead they just head here because we are seen as a soft touch. The more that come the more our own society and way of life will be destroyed.

Close the borders completely. We are FULL!!!

It scares me that people like you and your completely screwed up thinking actually have the vote.

Answer 3

Actually, in order to maintain the "society" which people live in, certain rules must be established. You are right in that no one is born "illegal" because "illegal" is a concept created by us. A term we use to use when an action is not wanted by the majority of the population in the civilization which classified the action as illegal.

Answer 4

a million & 2 - i think of the youngster has a God given, and constitutionally secure, staggering to his or her identity it incredibly is violated by the "criminal fiction" of adoption. This violation is worse in closed adoptions. This staggering is customary by precisely an identical amendments to the U. S. shape that are was once sure the 1st mom's staggering to privateness and that form the beginning up of Roe v. Wade. I skinny the youngster's staggering trumps the mum's or the adopters' rights to privateness. i think of that's incorrect to artificially replace the youngster's identity. Open adoptions would desire to have enforceable touch provisions, and would desire to have provisions to return the youngster to the 1st family contributors while that's in the youngster's terrific interest to take action. 3. i could pass kicking and screaming into my grave previously i could provide away a baby. there is not any such element as a difficulty the place one HAS to relinquish a baby, in basic terms circumstances the place values are at a loss for words between mammon and the mum-baby bond. there is often yet another decision. 4. i think of there are countless babies over the age of two, that have particular desires, or that have come from abusive residences that want kindness, love and look after in the foster care equipment that would not be back to their actual dad and mom. i think of taking in this type of baby brings many reward. i think of there are a number of APs and PAPs that are in basic terms interested in adopting an toddler, and capitalize on the misfortune of others and use the unethical practices in the adoption industry to purchase their babies, ensuing in corruption and crimes that turn my abdomen. 5. i know and have know countless adoptees, adopters, first mothers and common fathers. 6. My spouse's ex-husband asked me to undertake his 3 daughters so he would desire to get out of paying baby help. I declined. 7. for people who seek for to undertake toddlers and tension the youngster trafficking industry, an entire loss of morals or an entire loss of information of what they're doing. for people who undertake from foster care, an excellent heart, quite some persistence and decision, plus all of different the attributes of dad and mom in spades. 8. indignant 9. i could be gentle to the particular emotional difficulty of the guy, empathize with their difficulty, yet in any different case handle them as i could everyone else.

Answer 5

I think you are way off base. Citizens of any country have their rights. They do not have to tolerate being set upon by anyone. We have laws to create order out of chaos.

Illegals come in all forms: drug dealers, terrorists, criminals, alcoholics, the mentally ill, people looking for hand outs.

Answer 6

Nonsense Shane.
Your proposal would be interesting if it carried the condition that everyone be solely responsible for themselves and respect the rights of others.
Is it your strategy to keep others down by not allowing everyone free reign to wander in and out of your house as they please?

Answer 7

could it be that sometimes some poor nations are poor because of their traditions and behaviour?

If so others are simply protecting themselves from disruptive behaviour.

You are entitled to what you have earned, not what I have earned.

People are illegal when they break laws. Don't break a law and you are not illegal. very clear

Answer 8

Definitely not that's why people have always defended their borders often with their lives