2007-07-21 09:56:22 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Does it matter, so long as the corporations get their man, or in this case woman.
2007-07-21 10:01:29 · answer #1 · answered by Ringo G. 4 · 2⤊ 3⤋
Clinton President, and that would guarantee a landslide in 08
Personally I think Richardson should be Clintons V.P.
Hes worked under Bill Clintons administration, and I think its a shame that hes not more popular, since he is the most qualified presidential candidate of the bunch!
If Obama was smart, he would try to hop on the clinton express now. He hasnt earned his chevrons in office yet as far as Im concerned, and that is a big thing, because how do we know he wont fall victim to the sorry I promised this but cant deliver group of presidents thats all too common.
No, let him earn his wings as a V.P. or a few more years in Congress, then we see him go for it all in 2016
2007-07-21 10:01:42 · answer #2 · answered by writersbIock2006 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Obama President and Clinton VP
Clinton's socialist views scare me!
2007-07-21 10:38:52 · answer #3 · answered by Jasmine 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
you are the closed-minded bigot. Who died and made you God? So the struggle in Iraq is "irrational," is it? have you ever forgotten how many have been killed on 9/11, and has it escaped you that considering that then not ONE American has died on U.S. soil on the palms of the terrorists? did you recognize that over a million,4 hundred shown al-Qaeda operatives have been captured and killed in Iraq so some distance? have been you apart from would conscious that WE DID discover weapons of mass destruction in Iraq -- one stockpile on my own contained sufficient organic and organic agent (with the transport equipment) to wipe out the full inhabitants of Iran? permit me answer that for you: No, you at the instant are not attentive to this considering which you blindly have self assurance each and everything you're informed by the mainstream liberal media with out question. not in basic terms that, you are the foulest of hypocrites. You communicate some greater "open-minded physique" being in the White living house, and in an identical breath you communicate on the subject of the "evil" it incredibly is the Republican occasion. So "open-minded" in basic terms ability those that see your attitude? Boy, it may be great to be all-understanding and all-seeing. Do us all a want: next time you opt for to submit a query it incredibly is unquestionably not something greater suitable than a rant of hate, look in the replicate and understand you're nowhere close to as enlightened, as open-minded, as information, and as accepting as you think of you're. And take a tip from a clever old Jewish chippie: "previously you furnish to do away with the microscopic piece of sawdust on your neighbor's eye, attend to the super Redwood on your guy or woman."
2016-10-22 07:07:35 · answer #4 · answered by deralin 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Clinton whould be president obama vice.
2007-07-21 09:59:32 · answer #5 · answered by maryann p 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Consider this---If Clinton is elected, America will have the ugliest first lady ever.
2007-07-21 10:02:06 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
Kim Jong would fit in nicely.
Or Ahmadinejad.
Hillary might take Obama Hussein as her VP, if he bowed down to her, and became "her boy".
GO HILLARY!!!!!!!!
2007-07-21 10:00:52 · answer #7 · answered by wolf 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
It matters who gets the primary. Unless someone goes under indepdent, which, i dont think will happen
2007-07-21 10:02:22 · answer #8 · answered by Joshrules 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Why would you want to vote for someone that sold you out for the illegals votes, Giving away what you have worked all your life for,free to them. If this is what you think is Pres== prime material.Here have we gone wrong???
2007-07-21 10:04:20 · answer #9 · answered by 45 auto 7 · 4⤊ 1⤋
Neither should be president. It's a shame either one of them are even in the congress.
2007-07-21 10:03:23 · answer #10 · answered by trf6x6 3 · 2⤊ 3⤋