2007-07-21 08:54:12 · 24 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Ninja Rabbit 007 can you show me that this is not the case?
2007-07-21 08:59:46 · update #1
The Republican Party, their allies, and oil and business alies that once hes through with his term will start kicking back to him bush's part of the billions he swindled off to them.
If BUSH was truly intent on sering the american public, then comments like he and chenney have made would have never ever came out of their mouth
"I dont care about the polls"
"we're not up for reelection"
And the fact that he hasnt lived up to any of his promises.....
"we will seek out those responsible for 9/11 with all means"
Yet never truly committed to bringing Bin Laden to justice.
Showed that his ultimate plot was to get rid of SADDAM, without any followup plan
And now our country has suffered dearly from it.
If Bush was wholeheartedly wanting to serve the america public, he would not be so secretive and unwilling to shed light and bring resolve to all the scandals.
2007-07-21 09:01:30 · answer #1 · answered by writersbIock2006 5 · 4⤊ 0⤋
The rich are richer but there are also a lot more of them.
The demographic shift is one of a portion of the population up the income and wealth ladder.
If you plot income in real dollars on the X axis and households on the Y axis, you get a curve - and that curve has shifted to the right.
A larger proportion of the country is rich - the increase representing people who have moved up.
A smaller proportion of the country is middle class.
About the same proportion of the country is poor or 'low income' - not poor but not middle class.
But at the same time we've had a massive influx of immigrants mostly from deeply impoverished countries - so the increase at the bottom isn't from people moving down, it's from very poor people moving in. Americans aren't getting poorer. Poor Mexicans are coming to America at a faster rate.
BTW this isn't a matter of opinion or a matter on which nobody knows the facts, or a matter on which the facts could support various interpretations. This is a black and white issue. Arguing that the middle class is moving down is like arguing that it snowed last night in Boston.
2007-07-21 09:07:02 · answer #2 · answered by truthisback 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
what's Biden's record with earmarks? what's Obama's record with being nonpartisan? _____ McCain's presidency would be what the country desires... and for all the attempting that i've got been doing for a year+ in attempting to love/help Obama like no else.. he hasn't completed something. he's a historic previous professor for 12+ years... (not stated on the DNC convention, of direction) and alter right into a scholar until eventually almost 30. he's 40 seven staggering? he's been working for President for 2 years and fully cognizant of his choose/direction considering that 2004.. staggering? so, the place's the accomplishments? we would desire to constantly pass waaaay lower back to the Chicago years, the early years - and why weren't those indexed (i replace into waiting). the place have been the individuals from Chicago that have been affected? -- or is this all smoke & mirrors with him? P.S. -- Did you rail approximately Edwards being picked as a working mate for JFKerry? with 3 years in the Senate or perhaps if... she's a Gov., she's run a state and a city. this is something. i could equate her city Council days with the State Senate of ANY State.. that's many times a not something job (and Obama did vote "present day" a hundred and eighty cases or perhaps if, instead of taking a stance on votes.. what replace into he THERE FOR, if he did not write law? replace into he a vote casting-puppet?
2016-10-22 07:02:40 · answer #3 · answered by deralin 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Corporate America... I gave Coragryph a thumbs up but I really don't think it debatable. If it were another party in office Bush would squeal like a pig.
No hard feelings for I usually agree with you Coragryph.
2007-07-21 09:07:33 · answer #4 · answered by Don W 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
KB&R, The Carlyle Group, BP, Exxon (eventually), Blackwater Securities....many many other Fortune 500 companies!!!
And let's not forget that his war in Iraq has generated and motivated alot of new Al Qaeda and insurgent recruits!!
They hate us now more than ever!!
2007-07-21 08:59:35 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 0⤋
He certainly hasn't served my best interests, if that is what you mean.
Some time ago, I saw an article "Bonus time at Goldman Sachs," where it was mentioned that this Wall Street firm paid out $16 billion (yes--that's correct--not millions but billions) to its employees, with as much as $100 million to its top performer.
By my standards, that's pretty good.
2007-07-21 09:42:26 · answer #6 · answered by Paul F 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
The Elite and Wealthy
2007-07-21 09:08:29 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
Corporate profit-taking.
2007-07-21 09:55:20 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Him, his family, arguably his view of what the president should be.
It's debatable whether his power grabs were for personal benefit, or whether he truly believed that every president should be above the law (under the "unitary executive theory")
2007-07-21 08:57:01 · answer #9 · answered by coragryph 7 · 9⤊ 1⤋
The Bin Laden family and Dick Cheney's.
2007-07-21 08:57:44 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 1⤋