When it come to answering questions, that is.
2007-07-21 07:38:54 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
True, NEObillyfree; thanks for reminding me.
2007-07-21 07:43:52 · update #1
nope.
"freedom fries"
"staying the course"
"christian morals and values"
"oops..bush did it again"
"damn the french"
"starts at conception"
"cut social spending"
"damn the seniors'
"damn the poor"
"tax loopholes"
"largest decrease in the dollar in recent history"
2007-07-21 07:43:43 · answer #1 · answered by elysialaw 6 · 5⤊ 5⤋
Have yet to hear these words from Bush...heard lots of speeches even "Letterman's see what an olf POTUS you elected when you could have had Jane Fonda's lover, Kerry and no war just lots of dead Americans" entertaining videos.
This is the Democrat steriotypical republican.
Too many are Republocrats.
I'd like to see a POTUS 1/3 as good as Reagan...just 1/3!
Had high hopes for Bush but he's a Democrat on immigration, Clinton, vetoing bad legislation in general, and only dared 1/3 pardon for the most obviously innocent man I've ever seen. If Bush fails to pardon the two immigration heroes from solitary confinement next week...I'll be even more disappointed. If he does, I'll think he needs a weigh scale for his cajones!
2007-07-21 14:52:20 · answer #2 · answered by acct10132002 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
It baffles be that the Bushies on this forum continue to buy into Red Scare terminology. I mean, come on. History permits us a vantage point of objective consideration, and yet these guys have learned nothing of McCarthyism or how many people the Red Scare has hurt in our country.
2007-07-21 14:44:43 · answer #3 · answered by 1848 3 · 2⤊ 5⤋
No, we would still have bleeding hearts, bed wetters, tree hugger, and a host of others.
2007-07-21 14:56:22 · answer #4 · answered by Sparky 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
gee dumdum..maybe a lesson on semantics would be appropriate ..or maybe not considering your expansive
vocabulary..
or maybe we could post 2,000 word posts like that fillabustering troll superpolitics
2007-07-21 14:45:08 · answer #5 · answered by UMD Terps 3 · 2⤊ 3⤋
No, our vocabulary still includes:
tax cuts
rapidly rising tax revenue
low unemployment
low inflation
2007-07-21 14:41:44 · answer #6 · answered by truthisback 3 · 5⤊ 5⤋
LOL, Fox would be in overdrive creating new spin words....
But then, where would I be if I couldn't use the words, "elitist" "nationalist" "racist" "homophobic" and "war mongering"???
ok, add to that - "environmental terrorist", "education-hating", "flag waving", "Nixon not-a-crooking", "spin creating", "oil-swilling" and "xenophobic".
2007-07-21 14:43:09 · answer #7 · answered by rabble rouser 6 · 4⤊ 4⤋
No, we still have Marxist, Surrender monkey's, Defeatists, perverts, unborn baby hunters, Anti Americans, child predators, Anarchists, Etc.
2007-07-21 14:42:51 · answer #8 · answered by NEOBillyfree 4 · 9⤊ 5⤋
No. We are far more erudite, sophisticated and educated than the bottom feeding mutoids who make up 98% of the Democratic party.
Thanks for asking, though.
2007-07-21 14:42:36 · answer #9 · answered by Skooz 4 · 4⤊ 6⤋
I believe just Clinton would suffice !! LOL !
2007-07-21 14:43:46 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 3⤋