How is it that Bush alone has the power to veto any bill/decision, yet the senate needs 60 votes to override i

Question

when the senate held a recent all-night session with regards to the Iraq war, it was reported that the president planned to veto their decision to begin pulling troops out of Iraq by April 2008. I was initially led to believe that the president's decision was made only upon hearing about the session, but I later recalled that he had in fact stated previously that he would veto anything that involved a specific date for withdrawal. But not only did the decision to begin removing troops fall short of the 60 votes needed to pass in the senate,but the president would veto it anyway even if it did pass. Now I may be wrong, but I always thought congress/senate had the power to override any decision made by the president provided they had the necessary support (in this case the 60 votes needed by the senate) to prevent an autocracy on the part of the president. So how could Bush have vetoed the decision anyway even if it had passed in the senate? He alone would not have the power to. Would he

Answer 1

DUH!!! Its called being PRESIDENT

Answer 2

you're incorrect in that a invoice could desire to pass the dwelling house and Senate--yet purely with a majority (50% +). there's a complicating factor no longer interior the form, in spite of the shown fact that. The Senate and dwelling house make certain the "regulations of order"--how committes latest expenses, how debate is performed, etc. for the time of their tenure, the GOP majority replaced those regulations so as that it takes a 60% majority interior the Sanate to tension a billl to a vote. consequently, the minority can often times block a invoice, even in spite of the undeniable fact that they have got not got the votes to surely defeat it. that's what got here approximately to the immigration invoice. in spite of the shown fact that--while a invoice does pass, t purely demands that straightforward majority--so wen Bush vetoed the Iraq investment invoice because of the fact it had timetables, the Senate mandatory a 2/3 majority to override the veto. As to why the form says this--its portion of the exams and balances equipment. via giving the president a veto, the form effectively prevents Congress from passing any invoice it desires up. on an analogous time, the president would not have limitless veto ability, considering that if a invoice has adequate help, it particularly is handed besides. The systems no longer suited--yet its nevertheless way ahead of regardless of's in 2d place!

Answer 3

Because it is the power granted the president as a form of checks and balances on the legislative branch by the constitution. He can veto even if a bill is passed (House) 435-0 and (Senate) 100-0 and then the decision would have to be re-passed by both houses of Congress by a two thirds margin. So in the House by a vote of 290 or more and in the senate by a vote of 66 or more.

Answer 4

The Constitution gives the President the unilateral power to veto any legislation. If he vetoes a bill, it goes back to Congress. Congress can then vote a second time on the bill. If the bill gets two-thirds in both houses on that second vote, it becomes law despite the President's veto.

The 60 votes is not to pass but to close debate and bring it to a vote. Part of the Senate rules allow unlimited debate on any legislation unless there is no objection to calling a vote or 60 Senators vote to end debate and schedule a vote. On actual passage, only a simple majority is required.

Answer 5

Vetos are part of checks and balances, just like overrides.

The Senate actually needs 67 to override (a 2/3rds majority).

I don't know why they need 60 votes to pass, it's usually a simple majority.

Answer 6

It is called the executive branch of the government. Go back to 5th grade and learn this again. If they pass something, the president can veto it. Did you ever watch School House Rock?

This will explain it:
http://youtube.com/watch?v=nlka6fTnDnI

Answer 7

If it passed in the Senate and he vetoed it, it would go back and they would start over and try to override his veto. Yes he does have that power.

Answer 8

It's the exact same as it is with EVERY president. Are you going to complain about each and every single one of the too?

Answer 9

The answer is found in the U.S Constitution.
You probably should not have slept through so many classes.
Let me guess.
Public School Education?

Answer 10

Its no longer about the rule of law, the checks and balances, or our Constitution. These jerks place their partisan idiology above the best interests of the nation. It all began with Nixon.

Answer 11

The president is the head of state, he is almost above the law,but he isn't- he could be impeached.