Please tell us what, if anything, separates George Bush from the political philosophy of Adolph Hitler?

Question

Inspired By: http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=ArDOL89r8V0WxKeDvBmW1WDsy6IX?qid=20070720143618AAZPzJH

Answer 1

Actually very little. If one wants to get right down to it, the chimp will put the blame on everything and everybody except himself.
Adolf Hitler is the incarnation of absolute evil;Hitler led his people to a shameful defeat without precedent.
The chimp is also a very evil man. Calls for the impeachment of Bush have been made by various groups and individuals, with their reasons usually centering on the NSA warrantless surveillance controversy the Bush administration's justification for the war in Iraq and violations of the Geneva Conventions Opinion polling has shown that about half of Americans would support impeaching Bush if it was found that he had lied about the reasons for the war in Iraq.

Answer 2

Trying to make a statement on yahoo? not going to work. If you had any bit of intelligence you would know that George Bush is the complete opposite of Adolph Hitler. Just because George Bush wants a strong government and not take crap from enemies is nothing close to Hitler. If you want a Democratic president, don't come crying when there is another 9/11. Wait till the next election when the Republicans win again and then you and your Democratic friends can start complaining like you guys do every year. By the way, no one is supporting your theory.

Answer 3

Hitler tried to rule the world; Bush is trying to bring PEACE to the world. When you have people, like Hitler, in the world that want other people to do as they say and will not listen to reason, then the only way to deal with these people is to eliminate their control at all cost. Sure, it would be nice to be able to TALK to someone and come to a compromise; however, there are people in this world that believe their way is the only way and they must be dealt with accordingly. Bush cannot act alone; he must have the approval of Congress. Therefore, he is not solely responsible. I like being able to decide what I will do everyday and how I will do it. America is not prefect but it sure the hell is better than most places on this earth. If America is such a bad place, then why do so many people want to live here.

Answer 4

There are a lot of Jews in the administration and supporters.
It is the Liberals and socialists in the United States who are supporting the real Fascists. Joe Kennedy supported Hitler Ted Kennedy also helped the Russians during Reagans administration. Liberals want to regulate political speech. Like the Nazis they keep trying to errode minority rights in the Congress. Amazing how your comparison just falls apart.
Just like your ability to end the war, feckless.

Answer 5

There are no substantial differences.

--------------------------------

Like Hitler, President Bush was not elected by a majority, but was forced to engage in political maneuvering in order to gain office.

Like Hitler, Bush began to curtail civil liberties in response to a well-publicized disaster, in Hitler’s case the Reichstag fire, in Bush’s case the 9-11 catastrophe.

Like Hitler, Bush went on to pursue a reckless foreign policy without the mandate of the electorate and despite the opposition of most foreign nations.

Like Hitler, Bush displays great populist enthusiasm in his patriotic speeches, but primarily serves wealthy investors who subsidize his election campaigns and share with him their comfortable lifestyle.

Like Hitler, Bush promotes a future world order that guarantees his own nation’s hegemonic supremacy rather than cooperative harmony

Like Hitler, Bush scraps international treaties, most notably the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty, the Biological Weapons Convention, the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty, the Convention on the Prohibition of Land Mines, the Chemical Weapons Convention, the Kyoto Global Warming Accord, and the International Criminal Court.

Like Hitler, Bush repeats lies often enough that they come to be accepted as the truth. Bush and his spokesmen argued, for example, that they had taken every measure possible to avoid war, than an invasion of Iraq would diminish (not intensify) the terrorist threat against the U.S., that Iraq was linked with Al Qaeda, and that nothing whatsoever had been achieved by U.N. inspectors to warrant the postponement of U.S. invasion plans. All of this was false. They also insisted that Iraq hid numerous weapons it did not possess since the mid-190s, and they refused to acknowledge the absence of a nuclear weapons program in Iraq since the early nineties. As perhaps to be expected, they indignantly accused others of deception and evasiveness.

Like Hitler, Bush and his cohorts emphasize the ruthlessness of their enemies in order to justify their own.

Like Hitler, Bush launches unilateral invasions on a supposedly preemptive basis.

Like Hitler, Bush has no qualms about imposing “regime change” by installing Quisling-style client governments backed by a U.S. military occupation with both political and economic control entirely in the hands of Americans.

Answer 6

Your comparison and the comparison of the question of the link you post have nothing in common. Hillery has a history of being a Socialist. Her college thesis in her own hand. Her defense of the Black Panthers criminal organization and the P.L.O. She has even said recently that even though Americans are doing better because of the tax cuts, that they have to be taken away for the "good" of the masses.

Answer 7

A world of education and intelligence would show the tremendous differences.
Hillary, however, is still very close ideologically to Marx.
Guess we should have the Supreme Court abolish any type of education that doesn't support the far left.

Answer 8

Read a history book.

Hitler would have burned the Capitol building by now. He would line up civilians in front of firing squads in any Iraqi city where one of his soldiers was killed. You would be in prison by now.

Hitler would have confiscated Iraq's oil just after invading and not sent any money there. He would have invaded Mexico for their oil and Canada for their timber. Then he would put their citizens in prison camps to make up the work left by the millions of men he drafted.

Hitler would have supported Hamas and wiped out Israel.

Answer 9

I am not a Bush supporter but I don't think one could compare him with Hitler either.

Answer 10

You still are able to post a question like this on this board. Hitler's policies would have had you as a distant memory.