They sure do. Their so obsessed with their hate mongering and attempting to make others look badly (although they have the same agenda), that they're losing face. You can only fool the public for so long.
It's good that these people decided to announce as early has they have. We'll sit back, watch and enjoy the destruction. :)
2007-07-21 03:47:06
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
2⤋
And that my friend, even the least amongst us, can see through ! Whether they chose to or not, is another question.
The hatred for Hillary is not diminishing in this country, if anything it continues to spiral, unabated. The best the dems who support her can achieve is a country divided, if she ever gains office.
Hillary is a lightning rod, not a magnet. The Clinton's were more responsible than anyone for the outright hostility between the left and the right, when they last occupied the White House. This can be avoided if Americans, particularly democrats, wake up to the possibility this hostility towards the Clinton's, combined with seething hatred growing against Hillary, will only exacerbate the divide between Americans.
We need a unifier in the White House, someone who can represent all Americans, yet someone who will put national security, not national health care, first ! We need someone who understands the value of diplomacy, yet can and will carry a big stick ! We need a leader who will not turn it's back on commitment and international friendship, yet will recognize and set a standard as to when hostilities are necessary, and when diplomacy is more practical. We need a leader who will acknowledge domestic and economic issues, and not let them fester because of inattention.
It matters very little which party this individual represents, I would vote for this individual no matter which side of the aisle he favors. Americans can serve their country so much more effedtively if they dropped this party crap, and voted for the person, and the issues they sincerely support. Five minute sound bites and speeches designed for special interest groups are probably the most dishonest and insincere form of campaigning on the national circuit, today. Let's get past it folks, and stop these wannabes fron treating us like a flea circus.
2007-07-21 11:12:29
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
The Democrats are in a bind - their most rabid support comes from such an extreme minority, they spend all their time juggling to try to keep the two in balance, because they know the majority of Americans don't think like that, but the majority of their money COMES from the minority extremist left-wing side. Until they wean themselves off the bitter Sheehanism thinking, they will never be an effective party for a long time, no matter if they're the Majority in Congress now or not. Look how they've accomplished almost NOTHING of consequence since their November '06 elections. Nada. Name ONE thing of value. AM Talk Radio is more effective than they are! AM Radio! HA! HA! HA!
- The Gremlin Guy -
2007-07-21 10:55:57
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
180 days, yes, that's a true test. A narrow majority and a president who finally found his veto pen, ensure a losing proposition. Hillary, despite repeated attempts to portray her as such, has never been in favor among the fringe left. Shes far more moderate than Rush would have you believe, but then again if you believe Rush you've already stopped thinking for yourself.
We won the war, Saddams gone, they have held elections twice, we did what we said we were going to do. If the Iraqis wish to kill each other that's too bad, they don't seem to be able to run a government or train their police to function, and when it comes to cut, run and take bribes, they are legendary.
You really want me to worry about the genocide of a group who takes a vacation instead of hammering out the solution to their country woes?
2007-07-21 10:51:34
·
answer #4
·
answered by justa 7
·
3⤊
1⤋
What will the liberals do?
Support Mike Gravel for President!
http://www.gravel2008.us/
Mike Gravel's Open Letter to Harry Reid and Senate Democrats: Stop Showboating.
Dear Harry,
I am glad to see that you have finally used the powers of the Senate to try to stop the war, but frankly I agree with the Republicans: this week's Senate sleepover was more theater than substance.
First off, the Reed-Levin bill will not stop the war; it calls for a limited pullout that would leave the rest of our troops even more vulnerable. If we are going to fight to end the war, let's fight for a bill like I proposed which would immediately begin a complete troop withdrawal and make it a felony for George Bush to continue the war. Clinton, Biden, Obama and Dodd say they want to end the war, but so far none have submitted a bill that would really do it....
Read the rest here:
http://www.gravel2008.us/?q=node/1735
2007-07-21 10:44:26
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 5
·
0⤊
2⤋
Hillary Clinton is really Hugo Chavez in drag, she's a committed Socialist that believes anyone rich is a bad, evil person (except of course her and her husband) no matter how hard they worked or how innovative they were.
I don't really consider Hillary electable -- I know she thinks she deserves it and she's earned it by putting up with her husband, she is just so unlikeable. The lunatics that back her think she's great, it's similar to the blacks that fall for the poverty pimp Al Sharpton and his line of BS, but so many people see through her and/or dislike her I don't think she stands a chance.
The real hope for the democrats is Obama -- he's got no record to scrutinize. He's spent his entire time in elected office running for another office. It's kind of like getting a job in the mail room at Apple and a few months later your Steve Jobs, you may do a good job but nobody knows till your in the seat
2007-07-21 11:13:12
·
answer #6
·
answered by Russ 2
·
1⤊
2⤋
Hillary Clinton is doing quite well. If you want to examine self-implosion I suggest that you look at what’s happening to the Republican Party. They have no candidate that can overcome the public’s revulsion to the Republican Party after having experienced several years of the Bush presidency.
2007-07-21 10:55:21
·
answer #7
·
answered by tribeca_belle 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
hahahahahah you got jokes. Hillary is growing in popularity... but keep on wishing, hoping, dreaming... the get ready to say Madame President
2007-07-21 11:11:37
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Funy, but her ratings are higher than the GOP. How's that? The GOP is falling apart. Bush is to blame because he & Cheney wanted this war. Halliburton is making a profit from this war. Anyone in the White House have anything to do with that?
2007-07-21 10:47:03
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
3⤋
I think it is a transparent attempt to convince people that Hillary is not part of the fringe far left. If people believe she is there is no way she can win.
2007-07-21 10:46:41
·
answer #10
·
answered by Brian 7
·
2⤊
2⤋