For such an important position, should there not be batteries of psychological tests done and the results made part of the public debate of who is best qualified? Should we not know whether they have read Machiavelli and the Art of WAr or whether they have read at all?
2007-07-21 02:53:49 · 14 answers · asked by ningis n 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Yes, any candidate for president should undergo such a battery of tests. In fact, any candidate for major public office should. That is a great suggestion. You should forward that to your Senator and Representative.
Look at Germany 1932. The most sophisticated democracy in the world at that time elected a total monster. It could easily happen to us.
Seriously, make the suggestion.
2007-07-21 03:00:21 · answer #1 · answered by James S 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Anyone who dares run for the highest office of this country must be mad. Look at some of the things being said on this site. I'm new here and am astounded at some of the things that I'm reading.
Would a sane person run? I have my doubts.
2007-07-21 10:04:37 · answer #2 · answered by Obama WHO? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The election process seems to work after the grilling a man gets before they get into the White House has pass the toughest test possible.
We haven't had one yet.
2007-07-21 09:59:25 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
You mean AGAIN?
If we did Clinton, Obama, Rudy and Thompson would not be ahead in the polls. Joe Bidden would be ahead for the Dem and Paul would lead the GOP ticket.
2007-07-21 10:02:47 · answer #4 · answered by mymadsky 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think the first step, although some people will hate this statement, is to realize that if our next President is ok with the killing of unborn Children, then he would be unfit to serve as President.
2007-07-21 09:59:57 · answer #5 · answered by Big Timmy 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
As long as its the world's most powerful job and it costs at least $200 million dollars to get the job...
You're not going to get anything other than madmen and megalomaniacs.
2007-07-21 09:59:58 · answer #6 · answered by freedom first 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
seriously,you mean another one??????
the current administration is as close to insane as i've seen in my 49 years.
and the religious zealot,terror stricken people who still support that idiot deserve what they got.
9/11 pales in comparison to what our religious extremist president has done in the middle east.
he just did it slower.
2007-07-21 10:43:35 · answer #7 · answered by bo-bo 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I agree. candidates should be required to test for emotional and phychological probelms...in a room by themselves so they can't cheat
2007-07-21 10:25:40 · answer #8 · answered by Ford Prefect 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Clinton's not a man? She's more more of a man than any of them, and madder too.
2007-07-21 09:58:56 · answer #9 · answered by osborne_pkg 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Clinton is smart and not a man.
2007-07-21 09:58:21 · answer #10 · answered by Nicholas S 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋